Wisconsin Statutes
Wis. Stat. § 1.07 (2026)
State coat of arms
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
1.071.07 State coat of arms. The coat of arms of the state of Wisconsin is declared to be as follows:
Arms.—Or, quartered, the quarters bearing respectively a plow, a crossed shovel and pick, an arm and held hammer, and an anchor, all proper; the base of shield resting upon a horn of plenty and pyramid of pig lead, all proper; over all, on fesse point, the arms and motto of the United States, namely: Arms, palewise of 13 pieces argent and gules; a chief azure; motto (on garter surrounding inescutcheon), “E pluribus unum”.
Crest.—A badger, passant, proper.
Supporters.—Dexter, a sailor holding a coil of rope, proper; sinister, a yeoman resting on a pick, proper.
Motto.—Over crest, “Forward”.
1.07 NoteNOTE: An example of the state coat of arms is shown below:
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases, 1970–2013 · leading case: Marshall Schinner v. Michael Gundrum, 2013 WI 71 (Wis. 2013).
Marshall Schinner v. Michael Gundrum, 2013 WI 71 (Wis. 2013). “See 1 New Appleman Law of Liability Insurance, § 1.07[2] (2d ed. 2012). ¶135 In order to fall within the grant of coverage, the Second Amended Complaint must allege facts showing that Schinner's bodily injury was caused by an "occurrence," which is defined as an "accident.”
Wadzinski v. Auto-Owners Ins., 2012 WI 75 (Wis. 2012). “Thomas, New Appleman on Insurance Law Library Edition § 1.07[8] (2009) (emphasis added). Often, endorsements are used by an insurer to tailor a standard policy to the needs of a particular insured or the regulatory requirements of a particular state.”
Wisconsin Student Ass'n v. Regents of Univ. of Wis., 318 F. Supp. 591 (W.D. Wis. 1970). “APPENDIX II Regents’ Statement of Intent — October 17, 1969: To clarify an apparent misunderstanding that has arisen as to the intent of the Regents in adopting Section 1.07(9) *598 of the Administrative Code and the incidents of use of sound amplification equipment which are to…”
Martinson v. Kellogg-Citizens Nat'l Bank, 182 N.W.2d 238 (Wis. 1971). “” “Section 1.07. I intend that the value for federal estate tax purposes of the property in the Marital Trust, whether passing into said trust under this will or otherwise, shall be available for the marital deduction allowed by the federal estate tax law applicable to my estate.”
Special Souvenirs, Inc. v. Town of Wayne, 56 F. Supp. 2d 1062 (E.D. Wis. 1999). “, Zoning Ordinance § 1.07 (1994). Section 66.12, Wis.Stat., on the other hand, merely provides that an action for violation of a municipal ordinance is a civil action and may be brought in state court.”
Capitol Indem. Corp. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins., 357 F. Supp. 399 (W.D. Wis. 1972). “See Long, 1 Liability Insurance § 1.07. Under Condition D of the policy, having obtained a final judgment against the insured (Roblee-Johnson & Company), Capitol is authorized to proceed directly against S.”
Sturzl Constr. Co. v. City of Green Bay, 276 N.W.2d 771 (Wis. 1979). “Since we conclude that the Mayor is without authority to veto the action or inaction of the Common Council, we are not obliged to consider the other arguments pre *411 sented regarding the Mayor’s alleged failure to file his objections with the City Clerk and the Mayor’s failure…”
Wis. Stat. § 1.07(9): 1 case
Wisconsin Student Ass'n v. Regents of Univ. of Wis., 318 F. Supp. 591 (W.D. Wis. 1970). “APPENDIX II Regents’ Statement of Intent — October 17, 1969: To clarify an apparent misunderstanding that has arisen as to the intent of the Regents in adopting Section 1.07(9) *598 of the Administrative Code and the incidents of use of sound amplification equipment which are to…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.