Wis. Stat. » CHAPTER 138 — MONEY AND RATES OF INTEREST
Wisconsin Statutes

Wis. Stat. § 138.03 (2026)

Judgments, how computed

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
138.03138.03 Judgments, how computed. Except as provided in ss. 806.30 to 806.44, in all judgments or decrees rendered by any court of justice for any debt, damages or costs and in all executions issued thereon the amount shall be computed, as near as may be, in dollars and cents, rejecting smaller fractions; and no judgment or other proceeding shall be considered erroneous for such omissions. In actions or proceedings under ss. 806.30 to 806.44, the court, in the interest of justice, may direct that all evidence submitted to the jury and the jury verdict be in U.S. dollars at a rate of exchange established by the court. The court shall convert the jury verdict to the foreign money at that rate of exchange.
138.03 HistoryHistory: 1991 a. 236.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1994–2003 · leading case: Blue Cross & Blue Shield United of Wisconsin v. Marshfield Clinic, 881 F. Supp. 1309 (W.D. Wis. 1994).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Blue Cross & Blue Shield United of Wisconsin v. Marshfield Clinic, 881 F. Supp. 1309 (W.D. Wis. 1994). · cites it 2× “In their complaint plaintiffs allege defendants violated the Sherman Antitrust Act; the Wisconsin antitrust statute, section 138.03(2), and the illegal contracts section of the Wisconsin statutes, section 133.”
Versatile Plastics, Inc. v. Sknowbest! Inc., 247 F. Supp. 2d 1098 (E.D. Wis. 2003). · cites it 2× “Counts 5 and 6 are for illegal restraint of trade under Wis. Stat. § 138.03 and 15 U.S.C. § 1 (Sherman Act).”
Wis. Stat. § 138.03(2): 1 case
Blue Cross & Blue Shield United of Wisconsin v. Marshfield Clinic, 881 F. Supp. 1309 (W.D. Wis. 1994). “In their complaint plaintiffs allege defendants violated the Sherman Antitrust Act; the Wisconsin antitrust statute, section 138.03(2), and the illegal contracts section of the Wisconsin statutes, section 133.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.