Wisconsin Statutes
Wis. Stat. § 153.10 (2026)
Health care data reports
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
153.10(1)(1) Subject to s. 153.455, the department shall prepare, and submit to the governor and the chief clerk of each house of the legislature for distribution to the legislature under s. 13.172 (2), standard reports concerning health care providers other than hospitals and ambulatory surgery centers that the department prepares and shall collect information necessary for preparation of those reports. If s. 153.455 (4) applies, the department shall include in the reports under this subsection reports concerning any health care claims information the department collects or contracts to collect under s. 153.05.
153.10(2)(2) The entity under contract under s. 153.05 (2m) (a) shall prepare, and submit to the governor and the chief clerk of each house of the legislature for distribution to the legislature under s. 13.172 (2), standard reports concerning hospitals and ambulatory surgery centers that the entity prepares and shall collect information necessary for preparation of those reports.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1945–1973 · leading case: Head v. New Mexico Bd. of Examiners in Optometry, 374 U.S. 424 (1963).
Head v. New Mexico Bd. of Examiners in Optometry, 374 U.S. 424 (1963). “Code § 2937 (1961); Wis. Stat. Ann. § 153.10 . [4] The case is not one, therefore, in which the State seeks to justify a statute as a health measure on the attenuated theory that the economic well-being of a profession or industry will assure better performance in the public…”
Bedno v. Fast, 95 N.W.2d 396 (Wis. 1959). “” Sec. 153.10, Stats., must therefore be read and interpreted with those purposes in mind.”
Kindy v. Hayes, 171 N.W.2d 324 (Wis. 1969). “(The only statutory authority for restrictions on advertising at that time, applicable to a class broader than licensed optometrists, was contained in sec. 153.10, Stats.) When the board revoked a license of an optometrist for advertising in violation of rule Opt 9.”
Maryland Bd. of Pharmacy v. Sav-A-Lot, Inc., 311 A.2d 242 (Md. 1973). “The court said: "The language of sec. 153.10, Stats., in no way indicates that proof of fraud is necessary to spell out an offense under its price-advertising prohibition.”
Ritholz v. Johnson, 17 N.W.2d 590 (Wis. 1945). “The plaintiffs are partners doing business as Optical Stores Company, and bring the action to enjoin the Wisconsin Board of Examiners in Optometry from bringing actions to enforce sec. 153.10, Stats., on the ground that it is void as violative of the Fourteenth amendment of the…”
Stone v. Harris, 95 N.W.2d 764 (Wis. 1959). “The question at issue is to be determined, not from the statutory provisions referred to above, but by the provisions of sec.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.