Wisconsin Statutes
Wis. Stat. § 19.84 (2026)
Public notice
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
19.84(1)(1) Public notice of all meetings of a governmental body shall be given in the following manner:
19.84(1)(b)(b) By communication from the chief presiding officer of a governmental body or such person’s designee to the public, to those news media who have filed a written request for such notice, and to the official newspaper designated under ss. 985.04, 985.05 and 985.06 or, if none exists, to a news medium likely to give notice in the area. Communication from the chief presiding officer of a governmental body or such person’s designee shall be made to the public using one of the following methods:
19.84(1)(b)1.1. Posting a notice in at least 3 public places likely to give notice to persons affected.
19.84(1)(b)2.2. Posting a notice in at least one public place likely to give notice to persons affected and placing a notice electronically on the governmental body’s Internet site.
19.84(2)(2) Every public notice of a meeting of a governmental body shall set forth the time, date, place and subject matter of the meeting, including that intended for consideration at any contemplated closed session, in such form as is reasonably likely to apprise members of the public and the news media thereof. The public notice of a meeting of a governmental body may provide for a period of public comment, during which the body may receive information from members of the public.
19.84(3)(3) Public notice of every meeting of a governmental body shall be given at least 24 hours prior to the commencement of such meeting unless for good cause such notice is impossible or impractical, in which case shorter notice may be given, but in no case may the notice be provided less than 2 hours in advance of the meeting.
19.84(4)(4) Separate public notice shall be given for each meeting of a governmental body at a time and date reasonably proximate to the time and date of the meeting.
19.84(5)(5) Departments and their subunits in any University of Wisconsin System institution or campus are exempt from the requirements of subs. (1) to (4) but shall provide meeting notice which is reasonably likely to apprise interested persons, and news media who have filed written requests for such notice.
19.84(6)(6) Notwithstanding the requirements of s. 19.83 and the requirements of this section, a governmental body which is a formally constituted subunit of a parent governmental body may conduct a meeting without public notice as required by this section during a lawful meeting of the parent governmental body, during a recess in such meeting or immediately after such meeting for the purpose of discussing or acting upon a matter which was the subject of that meeting of the parent governmental body. The presiding officer of the parent governmental body shall publicly announce the time, place and subject matter of the meeting of the subunit in advance at the meeting of the parent body.
19.84 AnnotationThere is no requirement in this section that the notice provided be exactly correct in every detail. State ex rel. Olson v. City of Baraboo Joint Review Board, 2002 WI App 64, 252 Wis. 2d 628, 643 N.W.2d 796, 01-0201.
19.84 AnnotationSub. (2) does not expressly require that the notice indicate whether a meeting will be purely deliberative or if action will be taken. The notice must alert the public of the importance of the meeting. Although a failure to expressly state whether action will be taken could be a violation, the importance of knowing whether a vote would be taken is diminished when no input from the audience is allowed or required. State ex rel. Olson v. City of Baraboo Joint Review Board, 2002 WI App 64, 252 Wis. 2d 628, 643 N.W.2d 796, 01-0201.
19.84 AnnotationSub. (2) sets forth a reasonableness standard for determining whether notice of a meeting is sufficient that strikes the proper balance between the public’s right to information and the government’s need to efficiently conduct its business. The standard requires taking into account the circumstances of the case, which includes analyzing such factors as the burden of providing more detailed notice, whether the subject is of particular public interest, and whether it involves non-routine action that the public would be unlikely to anticipate. State ex rel. Buswell v. Tomah Area School District, 2007 WI 71, 301 Wis. 2d 178, 732 N.W.2d 804, 05-2998.
19.84 AnnotationThe supreme court declined to review the validity of the procedure used to give notice of a joint legislative committee on conference alleged to violate the sub. (3) 24-hour notice requirement. The court will not determine whether internal operating rules or procedural statutes have been complied with by the legislature in the course of its enactments and will not intermeddle in what it views, in the absence of constitutional directives to the contrary, to be purely legislative concerns. State ex rel. Ozanne v. Fitzgerald, 2011 WI 43, 334 Wis. 2d 70, 798 N.W.2d 436, 11-0613.
19.84 AnnotationUnder sub. (1) (b), a written request for notice of meetings of a governmental body should be filed with the chief presiding officer or designee, and a separate written request should be filed with each specific governmental body. 65 Atty. Gen. 166.
19.84 AnnotationDiscussing the method of giving notice pursuant to sub. (1). 65 Atty. Gen. 250.
19.84 AnnotationDiscussing the specificity of notice required by a governmental body. 66 Atty. Gen. 143, 195.
19.84 AnnotationDiscussing the requirements of notice given to newspapers under this section. 66 Atty. Gen. 230.
19.84 AnnotationA town board, but not an annual town meeting, is a “governmental body” within the meaning of the open meetings law. 66 Atty. Gen. 237.
19.84 AnnotationNews media who have filed written requests for notices of public meetings cannot be charged fees by governmental bodies for communication of the notices. 77 Atty. Gen. 312.
19.84 AnnotationA newspaper is not obligated to print a notice received under sub. (1) (b), nor is a governmental body obligated to pay for publication. Martin v. Wray, 473 F. Supp. 1131 (1979).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1979–2025 · leading case: State Ex Rel. Buswell v. Tomah Area Sch. Dist., 2007 WI 71 (Wis. 2007).
State Ex Rel. Buswell v. Tomah Area Sch. Dist., 2007 WI 71 (Wis. 2007). “¶ 2 Buswell advances that the notices violated Wis. Stat. § 19.84 (2) because they were not reasonably likely to apprise members of the public of the subject matter of the meetings and that the notices are inconsistent with the policies for the open meetings law as set forth in…”
State Ex Rel. H.D. Enter. II, LLC v. City of Stoughton, 602 N.W.2d 72 (Wis. Ct. App. 1999). “, and the open meetings notice provision in § 19.84, STATS., on January 15, 1998, the City provided published notice that it would consider the application.”
State v. Beaver Dam Area Dev. Corp., 2008 WI 90 (Wis. 2008). “" Wis. Stat. § 19.84 (l)(b). ¶ 136. The statute specifies how public notice must be given.”
State Ex Rel. Olson v. City of Baraboo Jt. Review Bd., 2002 WI App 64 (Wis. Ct. App. 2002). “§ 19.84 sets forth the requirements for providing notice for public meetings.”
Heritage Farms, Inc. v. Markel Ins., 2012 WI 26 (Wis. 2012). “Fairchild, Limitation of New Judge-Made Law to Prospective Effect Only: "Pro *154 spective Overruling" or "Sunbursting", 51 Marq.”
State ex rel. Ozanne v. Fitzgerald, 2011 WI 43 (Wis. 2011). “It is argued that Wis. Stat. § 19.84 (3) required 24 hours notice of that meeting and such notice was not given.”
State Ex Rel. Schaeve v. Van Lare, 370 N.W.2d 271 (Wis. Ct. App. 1985). “*47 Schaeve further argues that the public notices did not contain enough specific information to adequately inform the public and thereby failed to comply with sec. 19.84, Stats. We disagree. Section 19.”
State Ex Rel. Journal/Sentinel, Inc. v. Pleva, 456 N.W.2d 359 (Wis. 1990). “Section 19.84. Bruce Gill, a reporter for the Milwaukee Sentinel, sought to cover a meeting held on December 7, 1987 by *708 the Festival finance committee.”
State Ex Rel. Lawton v. Town of Barton, 2005 WI App 16 (Wis. Ct. App. 2004). “The third count alleged a violation of Wis. Stat. § 19.84 (l)(b), based on the Town Board's failure to provide notice to the news media of the April 29 removal meeting.”
City of Kaukauna v. Vill. of Harrison, 2015 WI App 73 (Wis. Ct. App. 2015). “The legislature explicitly requires that notices for open meetings "set forth the .”
Martin v. Wray, 473 F. Supp. 1131 (E.D. Wis. 1979). “Finally, the defendant states that the notice provisions of § 19.84 Wis.Stats. were applicable for the February meeting and that these notice provisions were complied with prior to the meeting of the town board.”
State Ex Rel. Journal/Sentinel, Inc. v. Pleva, 445 N.W.2d 689 (Wis. Ct. App. 1989). “4 See sec. 19.84, Stats. 5 See sec. 19.85(1), Stats.”
— Wis. Stat. § 19.84(1) — 1 case
Douglas Oitzinger v. City of Marinette (Wis. Ct. App. 2025).
— Wis. Stat. § 19.84(2) — 5 cases
State Ex Rel. Buswell v. Tomah Area Sch. Dist., 2007 WI 71 (Wis. 2007). “¶ 2 Buswell advances that the notices violated Wis. Stat. § 19.84 (2) because they were not reasonably likely to apprise members of the public of the subject matter of the meetings and that the notices are inconsistent with the policies for the open meetings law as set forth in…”
State Ex Rel. H.D. Enter. II, LLC v. City of Stoughton, 602 N.W.2d 72 (Wis. Ct. App. 1999). “, and the open meetings notice provision in § 19.84, STATS., on January 15, 1998, the City provided published notice that it would consider the application.”
State Ex Rel. Schaeve v. Van Lare, 370 N.W.2d 271 (Wis. Ct. App. 1985). “*47 Schaeve further argues that the public notices did not contain enough specific information to adequately inform the public and thereby failed to comply with sec. 19.84, Stats. We disagree. Section 19.”
State Ex Rel. Olson v. City of Baraboo Jt. Review Bd., 2002 WI App 64 (Wis. Ct. App. 2002). “§ 19.84 sets forth the requirements for providing notice for public meetings.”
Douglas Oitzinger v. City of Marinette (Wis. Ct. App. 2025).
— Wis. Stat. § 19.84(3) — 2 cases
State Ex Rel. H.D. Enter. II, LLC v. City of Stoughton, 602 N.W.2d 72 (Wis. Ct. App. 1999). “, and the open meetings notice provision in § 19.84, STATS., on January 15, 1998, the City provided published notice that it would consider the application.”
State ex rel. Ozanne v. Fitzgerald, 2011 WI 43 (Wis. 2011). “It is argued that Wis. Stat. § 19.84 (3) required 24 hours notice of that meeting and such notice was not given.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.