Wis. Stat. » CHAPTER 2 — DIVISION OF THE STATE INTO COUNTIES, AND THEIR BOUNDARIES
Wisconsin Statutes

Wis. Stat. § 2.03 (2026)

Jurisdiction of counties on boundary streams

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
2.032.03 Jurisdiction of counties on boundary streams. Whenever 2 counties are separated from each other by a river or a creek, the middle of the main channel of such river or creek shall be the division line between them, unless otherwise provided in the description of the boundaries of such counties. The counties so separated shall have common jurisdiction of all offenses committed on the waters between them, and all writs and process issued in any such county may be executed at any place on the waters of such river or creek opposite the county from which it was issued.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1965–2023 · leading case: AllEnergy Corp. v. Trempealeau Cnty. Env't & Land Use Comm., 2017 WI 52 (Wis. 2017).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
AllEnergy Corp. v. Trempealeau Cnty. Env't & Land Use Comm., 2017 WI 52 (Wis. 2017). · cites it 4× “12 See Trempealeau County Zoning Ordinance § 2.03(2). 10 No. 2015AP491 On August 27, 2013, the Department of Land Management deemed the plan "complete.”
Friends of Frame Park, U.A. v. City of Waukesha, 2022 WI 57 (Wis. 2022). “See Wisconsin Bill Drafting Manual § 2.03(2)(a)(2019–20) (advising drafters at the Legislative Reference Bureau to consider whether a word or phrase is "self-defining" by consulting "standard or legal dictionaries").”
State v. Corey T. Rector, 2023 WI 41 (Wis. 2023). “See Wisconsin Bill Drafting Manual § 2.03(2)(a) (2023– 24) (advising drafters at the Legislative Reference Bureau to consider whether a word or phrase is defined "in case law").”
Roberts v. Manitowoc Cnty. Bd. of Adjustment, 2006 WI App 169 (Wis. Ct. App. 2006). “, Code § 2.03(5)(a) (2005) ("There shall be a 5-minute limit on presentations unless the Board allows more time.”
DeWitt v. Ferries, 921 N.W.2d 188 (Wis. 2018). “…that there is sufficient evidence indicating that a cataloged site does not contain any burials. Wis. Admin. Code HS § 2.03 (6).”
Levine v. Supreme Court of Wisconsin, 679 F. Supp. 1478 (W.D. Wis. 1988). “See Nimmer on Freedom of Speech § 2.03 at 2-21. 3. Lathrop v. Donohue Defendants have contended from the outset that plaintiff’s First Amendment challenge to compulsory bar membership was put to rest in 1961 in Lathrop v.”
State v. Conway, 132 N.W.2d 539 (Wis. 1965). · cites it 2× “(d) For the recovery of distrained personal property, except that when personal property is seized in outlying waters under the provisions of section 29.”
Mahoney v. Kesery, 778 F. Supp. 1002 (E.D. Wis. 1991). · cites it 2× “See also Local Rule 2, Section 2.03(d). A review of the entire transcript demonstrates that Mr.”
Manpower, Inc. v. Mason, 405 F. Supp. 2d 959 (E.D. Wis. 2005). “” Gladys Glickman, Franchising § 2.03[2] (1999). A franchisor may place significant restrictions on a franchisee’s method of operation and quality of delivery in order to protect its product.”
Friends of Frame Park, U.A. v. City of Waukesha, 2022 WI 57 (Wis. 2022). “See Wisconsin Bill Drafting Manual § 2.03(2)(a)(2019–20) (advising drafters at the Legislative Reference Bureau to consider whether a word or phrase is "self-defining" by consulting "standard or legal dictionaries").”
State Ex Rel. Nordell v. Kinney, 215 N.W.2d 405 (Wis. 1974). “ainst a public officer or person appointed to execute his duties, for an act done by him in virtue of his office, or against a person who, by his command, or in his aid, shall do- anything touching the duties of such officer, (b) For the recovery of a penalty or forfeiture…”
Town of Easton v. Andrew L. Olson (Wis. Ct. App. 2020). · cites it 3× “According to the parties and the circuit court, § 2.03 of the zoning code defines the term “parking lot” as “[a] lot where automobiles are parked or stored temporarily, but not including the wrecking of automobile[s] or other vehicles or storage for the purpose of repair or…”
Show all 16 citing cases →
— Wis. Stat. § 2.03(17) — 1 case
Kathleen K. Navis v. Door Cnty. Bd. of Adjustment (Wis. Ct. App. 2021).
— Wis. Stat. § 2.03(2) — 1 case
AllEnergy Corp. v. Trempealeau Cnty. Env't & Land Use Comm., 2017 WI 52 (Wis. 2017). “12 See Trempealeau County Zoning Ordinance § 2.03(2). 10 No. 2015AP491 On August 27, 2013, the Department of Land Management deemed the plan "complete.”
— Wis. Stat. § 2.03(2)(a) — 3 cases
Friends of Frame Park, U.A. v. City of Waukesha, 2022 WI 57 (Wis. 2022). “See Wisconsin Bill Drafting Manual § 2.03(2)(a)(2019–20) (advising drafters at the Legislative Reference Bureau to consider whether a word or phrase is "self-defining" by consulting "standard or legal dictionaries").”
State v. Corey T. Rector, 2023 WI 41 (Wis. 2023). “See Wisconsin Bill Drafting Manual § 2.03(2)(a) (2023– 24) (advising drafters at the Legislative Reference Bureau to consider whether a word or phrase is defined "in case law").”
Friends of Frame Park, U.A. v. City of Waukesha, 2022 WI 57 (Wis. 2022). “See Wisconsin Bill Drafting Manual § 2.03(2)(a)(2019–20) (advising drafters at the Legislative Reference Bureau to consider whether a word or phrase is "self-defining" by consulting "standard or legal dictionaries").”
— Wis. Stat. § 2.03(5)(a) — 1 case
Roberts v. Manitowoc Cnty. Bd. of Adjustment, 2006 WI App 169 (Wis. Ct. App. 2006). “, Code § 2.03(5)(a) (2005) ("There shall be a 5-minute limit on presentations unless the Board allows more time.”
— Wis. Stat. § 2.03(d) — 1 case
Mahoney v. Kesery, 778 F. Supp. 1002 (E.D. Wis. 1991). “See also Local Rule 2, Section 2.03(d). A review of the entire transcript demonstrates that Mr.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.