Wisconsin Statutes
Wis. Stat. § 301.049 (2026)
Mother-young child care program
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
301.049(1)(1) Program. The department shall administer a mother-young child care program allowing females to retain, during participation in the program, the physical custody of their children.
301.049(2)(a)2.2. On probation, extended supervision or parole and who, if approved by the department under par. (b), would participate in the program as an alternative to revocation of probation, extended supervision or parole.
301.049(2)(b)(b) A female covered under par. (a) and her child may enter the program if all of the following conditions are met:
301.049(2)(b)2.2. The department approves and the female covered under par. (a) is pregnant or has a child who has not attained the age of one year.
301.049(3)(a)(a) Place program participants in the least restrictive placement consistent with community safety and correctional needs and objectives.
301.049(3)(b)(b) Provide a stable, safe and stimulating environment for each child participating in the program.
301.049(3)(d)(d) Provide program services with the goal of achieving a stable relationship between each mother and her child during and after participation in the program.
301.049(3)(e)(e) Prepare each mother to be able to live in a safe, lawful and stable manner in the community upon parole, extended supervision or discharge.
301.049(4)(4) Purchase of services. The department shall purchase the services of a private, nonprofit organization to administer the mother-young child care program.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 2008–2008 · leading case: Samuel v. Frank, 525 F.3d 566 (7th Cir. 2008).
Samuel v. Frank, 525 F.3d 566 (7th Cir. 2008). “Wis. Stat. § 301.049 . There are, of course, other possibilities, and surely social services was familiar with many of them in light of its obligation to preserve the family units whenever possible in conformity with the legislative purpose of the Children's Code governing the…”
Samuel, Stanley A. v. Frank, Matthew J. (7th Cir. 2008). “Wis. Stat. § 301.049 . There are, of course, other possibilities, and surely social services was familiar with many of them in light of its obligation to preserve the family units whenever possible in conformity with the legislative purpose of the Children’s Code governing the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.