Wisconsin Statutes
Wis. Stat. § 346.68 (2026)
Duty upon striking unattended vehicle
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
346.68346.68 Duty upon striking unattended vehicle. The operator of any vehicle which collides with any vehicle which is unattended shall immediately stop and either locate and notify the operator or owner of such vehicle of the name and address of the operator and owner of the vehicle striking the unattended vehicle or leave in a conspicuous place in the vehicle struck, a written notice giving the name and address of the operator and of the owner of the vehicle doing the striking and a statement of the circumstances thereof. Any such stop shall be made without obstructing traffic more than is necessary.
346.68 AnnotationA driver’s knowledge of a collision with an unattended vehicle need not be proved under this section. 68 Atty. Gen. 274.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1982–2023 · leading case: State v. Gaudesi, 332 N.W.2d 302 (Wis. 1983).
State v. Gaudesi, 332 N.W.2d 302 (Wis. 1983). “This review arises out of an unpublished decision of the court of appeals which reversed a judgment of conviction against Joseph Gaudesi for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant in violation of sec. 346.68(1), Stats., 1979-80. 1 The judgment was…”
State v. Haefer, 328 N.W.2d 894 (Wis. Ct. App. 1982). “Defendant was found guilty by a jury and appeals from a judgment of conviction for violation of sec. 346.68(1), Stats., operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated.”
State v. Gregory L. Cundy, 2023 WI App 41 (Wis. Ct. App. 2023). “§§ 346.68 and 346.74(3). “Conduct punishable only by a forfeiture is not a crime.”
— Wis. Stat. § 346.68(1) — 2 cases
State v. Gaudesi, 332 N.W.2d 302 (Wis. 1983). “This review arises out of an unpublished decision of the court of appeals which reversed a judgment of conviction against Joseph Gaudesi for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant in violation of sec. 346.68(1), Stats., 1979-80. 1 The judgment was…”
State v. Haefer, 328 N.W.2d 894 (Wis. Ct. App. 1982). “Defendant was found guilty by a jury and appeals from a judgment of conviction for violation of sec. 346.68(1), Stats., operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.