Wisconsin Statutes
Wis. Stat. § 403.118 (2026)
Statute of limitations
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
403.118(1)(1) Except as provided in sub. (5), an action to enforce the obligation of a party to pay a note payable at a definite time shall be commenced within 6 years after the due date or dates stated in the note or, if a due date is accelerated, within 6 years after the accelerated due date.
403.118(2)(2) Except as provided in sub. (4) or (5), if demand for payment is made to the maker of a note payable on demand, an action to enforce the obligation of a party to pay the note shall be commenced within 6 years after the demand. If no demand for payment is made to the maker, an action to enforce the note is barred if neither principal nor interest on the note has been paid for a continuous period of 10 years.
403.118(3)(3) Except as provided in sub. (4), an action to enforce the obligation of a party to an unaccepted draft to pay the draft shall be commenced within 3 years after dishonor of the draft or 10 years after the date of the draft, whichever period expires first.
403.118(4)(4) An action to enforce the obligation of the acceptor of a certified check or the issuer of a teller’s check, cashier’s check or traveler’s check shall be commenced within 3 years after demand for payment is made to the acceptor or issuer, as the case may be.
403.118(5)(5) An action to enforce the obligation of a party to a certificate of deposit to pay the instrument shall be commenced within 6 years after demand for payment is made to the maker, but if the instrument states a due date and the maker is not required to pay before that date, the 6-year period begins when a demand for payment is in effect and the due date has passed.
403.118(6)(6) An action to enforce the obligation of a party to pay an accepted draft, other than a certified check, shall be commenced within 6 years after the due date or dates stated in the draft or acceptance if the obligation of the acceptor is payable at a definite time or shall be commenced within 6 years after the date of the acceptance if the obligation of the acceptor is payable on demand.
403.118(7)(7) Unless governed by other law regarding claims for indemnity or contribution, an action for conversion of an instrument, for money had and received, or like action based on conversion, an action for breach of warranty or an action to enforce an obligation, duty or right arising under this chapter and not governed by this section shall be commenced within 3 years after the cause of action accrues.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 2005–2020 · leading case: Willowglen Academy - Wisconsin, Inc. v. Connelly Interiors, Inc., 2008 WI App 35 (Wis. Ct. App. 2008).
Willowglen Academy - Wisconsin, Inc. v. Connelly Interiors, Inc., 2008 WI App 35 (Wis. Ct. App. 2008). “claim on grounds that it was time barred by the statute of limitations specified in Wis. Stat. § 403.118 (7). 2 *780 ¶ 2. Connelly argues that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment to Willowglen because: (1) Connelly lacked actual knowledge of Jansen's fiduciary…”
Gerczak v. Est. of Gerczak, 2005 WI App 168 (Wis. Ct. App. 2005). “argues that these checks represented loans to the family business rather than unpaid wages and that his action is governed not by the two-year statute of limitations for unpaid wages, but the six-to-ten-year limitation for actions on notes, Wis. Stat. § 403.118 (2), or the…”
James Swiderski v. Swiderski Equip., Inc. (Wis. Ct. App. 2020). “§§ 403.118(1), 893.43, and 893.45. Despite MIC not citing any of these statutes in its briefs, James has addressed those statutes in his analysis of the statute of limitations issue.”
— Wis. Stat. § 403.118(1) — 1 case
James Swiderski v. Swiderski Equip., Inc. (Wis. Ct. App. 2020). “§§ 403.118(1), 893.43, and 893.45. Despite MIC not citing any of these statutes in its briefs, James has addressed those statutes in his analysis of the statute of limitations issue.”
— Wis. Stat. § 403.118(7) — 1 case
Willowglen Academy - Wisconsin, Inc. v. Connelly Interiors, Inc., 2008 WI App 35 (Wis. Ct. App. 2008). “claim on grounds that it was time barred by the statute of limitations specified in Wis. Stat. § 403.118 (7). 2 *780 ¶ 2. Connelly argues that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment to Willowglen because: (1) Connelly lacked actual knowledge of Jansen's fiduciary…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.