Wisconsin Statutes
Wis. Stat. § 48.35 (2026)
Effect of judgment and disposition
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
48.35(1)(a)(a) The judge shall enter a judgment setting forth his or her findings and disposition in the proceeding.
48.35(1)(b)(b) The disposition of a child or an unborn child, and any record of evidence given in a hearing in court, shall not be admissible as evidence against the child or the expectant mother of the unborn child in any case or proceeding in any other court except for the following:
48.35(1)(b)1.1. In sentencing proceedings after the child or expectant mother has been convicted of a felony or misdemeanor and then only for the purpose of a presentence investigation.
48.35(1)(b)2.2. In a proceeding in any court assigned to exercise jurisdiction under this chapter and ch. 938.
48.35(1)(b)3.3. In a court of civil or criminal jurisdiction while it is exercising jurisdiction over an action affecting the family and is considering the custody of a child.
48.35(2)(2) Except as specifically provided in sub. (1), this section does not preclude the court from disclosing information to qualified persons if the court considers the disclosure to be in the best interests of the child or unborn child or of the administration of justice.
48.35 HistoryHistory: 1971 c. 213 s. 5; 1973 c. 328; 1975 c. 39; 1977 c. 29; 1977 c. 354 ss. 59, 63; 1977 c. 447, 449; 1979 c. 32, 300, 331, 359; 1985 a. 321; 1987 a. 222; 1995 a. 27, 77; 1997 a. 205, 292.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12
cases, 1949–2005 · leading case: In Interest of Peter B., 516 N.W.2d 746 (Wis. Ct. App. 1994).
In Interest of Peter B., 516 N.W.2d 746 (Wis. Ct. App. 1994). “, (authorizing limited disclosure to "[e]ach known victim of a child's act"); § 48.35(2), STATS., (authorizing limited disclosure of dispositional information to "qualified persons"); § 48.”
United States v. Richard R. Glaser, 14 F.3d 1213 (7th Cir. 1994). “, Wis.Stat. § 48.35(l)(a). A “restoration of civil rights” almost always is a generic action, affecting entire classes of crimes and criminals.”
State v. Gustafson, 351 N.W.2d 653 (Wis. 1984). “Gustafson argues that under sec. 48.35(1)(b), Stats., it was error to allow evidence of R.”
United States v. Njb, a Male Juv., 104 F.3d 630 (4th Cir. 1997). “Code § 49-7-3 (1996); Wis. Stat. § 48.35 (1)(a) (1992). The sheer number of states that do not hold juveniles criminally “guilty” for crimes renders NJB’s construction of § 5032 unworkable.”
Kidd v. Schmidt, 399 F. Supp. 301 (E.D. Wis. 1975). “To date there have been no judicial proceedings regarding the plaintiff's commitment, and, indeed, that is the gravamen of his complaint.”
Green Cnty. Dep't of Human Servs. v. H.N., 469 N.W.2d 845 (Wis. 1991). “See sec. 48.35(2), Stats. 1975. In general, there were "no statutorily authorized time limits for the processing of cases in the juvenile court," the lack of which often resulted in an abuse of detention.”
State v. LA BINE, 542 N.W.2d 797 (Wis. Ct. App. 1995). “The release of records is governed by § 48.35, Stats. It states in relevant part: (1).”
Carter, Leonard v. United States, 133 F. App'x 321 (7th Cir. 2005). “Wis. Stat. § 48.35 (1993-94). Thus, Carter argues his juvenile adjudications should not have been taken into consideration during sentencing.”
State Ex Rel. Rickli v. Cnty. Court of Dane Cnty., 123 N.W.2d 908 (Wis. 1963). “” 3 The statutes make it clear that if the La Crosse county juvenile court were to find that Carl II is dependent, as alleged, and make a disposition of his case as authorized by sec. 48.35, Stats., such finding and disposition would control, and the Dane county court would be…”
In Interest of BJN, 469 N.W.2d 845 (Wis. 1991). “See sec. 48.35(2), Stats. 1975. In general, there were "no statutorily authorized time limits for the processing of cases in the juvenile court," the lack of which often resulted in an abuse of detention.”
Evangelical Lutheran Church v. Shawano Cnty., 40 N.W.2d 590 (Wis. 1949). ““(15) All the real and personal property of any children’s institution licensed for the care of dependent, neglected or delinquent children under sections 48.35 to 48.42 while the same is actually used for such purposes, and the real estate of the Home of the Friendless in the…”
State v. Stephens, 548 N.W.2d 108 (Wis. Ct. App. 1996). “More specifically, we are asked to decide whether the prior juvenile proceedings in this case constituted a juvenile "disposition" within the meaning of §§ 48.35(1)(c) and 48.39, Stats., 1 and whether cases interpreting and applying constitutional prohibitions against double…”
— Wis. Stat. § 48.35(1)(b) — 1 case
State v. Gustafson, 351 N.W.2d 653 (Wis. 1984). “Gustafson argues that under sec. 48.35(1)(b), Stats., it was error to allow evidence of R.”
— Wis. Stat. § 48.35(1)(c) — 1 case
State v. Stephens, 548 N.W.2d 108 (Wis. Ct. App. 1996). “More specifically, we are asked to decide whether the prior juvenile proceedings in this case constituted a juvenile "disposition" within the meaning of §§ 48.35(1)(c) and 48.39, Stats., 1 and whether cases interpreting and applying constitutional prohibitions against double…”
— Wis. Stat. § 48.35(2) — 5 cases
In Interest of Peter B., 516 N.W.2d 746 (Wis. Ct. App. 1994). “, (authorizing limited disclosure to "[e]ach known victim of a child's act"); § 48.35(2), STATS., (authorizing limited disclosure of dispositional information to "qualified persons"); § 48.”
Kidd v. Schmidt, 399 F. Supp. 301 (E.D. Wis. 1975). “To date there have been no judicial proceedings regarding the plaintiff's commitment, and, indeed, that is the gravamen of his complaint.”
Green Cnty. Dep't of Human Servs. v. H.N., 469 N.W.2d 845 (Wis. 1991). “See sec. 48.35(2), Stats. 1975. In general, there were "no statutorily authorized time limits for the processing of cases in the juvenile court," the lack of which often resulted in an abuse of detention.”
State v. LA BINE, 542 N.W.2d 797 (Wis. Ct. App. 1995). “The release of records is governed by § 48.35, Stats. It states in relevant part: (1).”
In Interest of BJN, 469 N.W.2d 845 (Wis. 1991). “See sec. 48.35(2), Stats. 1975. In general, there were "no statutorily authorized time limits for the processing of cases in the juvenile court," the lack of which often resulted in an abuse of detention.”
— Wis. Stat. § 48.35(l)(a) — 1 case
United States v. Richard R. Glaser, 14 F.3d 1213 (7th Cir. 1994). “, Wis.Stat. § 48.35(l)(a). A “restoration of civil rights” almost always is a generic action, affecting entire classes of crimes and criminals.”
— Wis. Stat. § 48.35(l)(b) — 1 case
State v. LA BINE, 542 N.W.2d 797 (Wis. Ct. App. 1995). “The release of records is governed by § 48.35, Stats. It states in relevant part: (1).”
— Wis. Stat. § 48.35(l)(c) — 1 case
State v. Stephens, 548 N.W.2d 108 (Wis. Ct. App. 1996). “More specifically, we are asked to decide whether the prior juvenile proceedings in this case constituted a juvenile "disposition" within the meaning of §§ 48.35(1)(c) and 48.39, Stats., 1 and whether cases interpreting and applying constitutional prohibitions against double…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.