Wisconsin Statutes
Wis. Stat. § 51.02 (2026)
Council on mental health
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
51.02(1)(a)(a) Advise the department, the legislature and the governor on the use of state and federal resources and on the provision and administration of programs for persons who are mentally ill or who have other mental health problems, for groups who are not adequately served by the mental health system, for the prevention of mental health problems and for other mental health related purposes.
51.02(1)(b)(b) Provide recommendations to the department on the expenditure of federal funds received under the community mental health block grant under 42 USC 300x to 300x-9 and participate in the development of and monitor and evaluate the implementation of, the community mental health block grant plan.
51.02(1)(c)(c) Review all departmental plans for services affecting persons with mental illness and monitor the implementation of the plans.
51.02(1)(f)(f) Consult with the department in the development of a model community mental health plan under s. 51.42 (7) (a) 9., and review and advise the department on community mental health plans submitted by counties under s. 51.42 (3) (ar) 5.
51.02(1)(g)(g) Promote the development and administration of a delivery system for community mental health services that is sensitive to the needs of consumers of the services.
51.02(1)(h)(h) Review and comment on the human services and community programs board member training curriculum developed by the department under s. 51.42 (7) (a) 3m.
51.02(2)(2) The secretary shall submit all departmental plans affecting persons with mental illness to the council for its review. The council shall provide its recommendations to the secretary within such time as the secretary may require.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 21
cases, 1917–2006 · leading case: Lessard v. Schmidt, 349 F. Supp. 1078 (E.D. Wis. 1972).
Lessard v. Schmidt, 349 F. Supp. 1078 (E.D. Wis. 1972). “1 The complaint sought declaratory and injunctive relief against the enforcement of certain portions of Wis. Stat.Ann. §§ 51.02, 51.03 and 51.04, relating to the procedure for involuntary detention and commitment of persons alleged to be suffering from mental illness.”
Lessard v. Schmidt, 379 F. Supp. 1376 (E.D. Wis. 1974). “Section 51.02, Wisconsin Statutes (1971), is further declared invalid in that it authorizes the omission of the service of the required notice; Probable Cause Hearing C.”
Humphrey v. Cady, 405 U.S. 504 (1972). “” Wis. Stat. Ann. §§ 51.02 (5), 51.03 (1957).”
Gordie Boucher Lincoln-Mercury Madison, Inc. v. City of Madison Plan Comm'n, 503 N.W.2d 265 (Wis. Ct. App. 1993). “Singer, Sutherland on Statutes and Statutory *90 Construction § 51.02, at 453 (Sands rev. 4th ed. 1984) (footnotes omitted)).”
Maxey v. Redevelopment Auth. of Racine, 353 N.W.2d 812 (Wis. Ct. App. 1984). “2d at 266-67 , quoting 2A Sutherland, Statutory Construction § 51.02 (4th ed. 1973). We conclude that the enactment of sec.”
Flejter v. Est. of Flejter Ex Rel. Migacz, 2001 WI App 26, 623 N.W.2d 552. “SINGER, 2B SUTHERLAND ON STATUTES AND STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION § 51.02, at 122 (5th ed. 1992); see also State v.”
State Ex Rel. Memmel v. Mundy, 249 N.W.2d 573 (Wis. 1977). “5 Sec. 51.02(4), Stats., repealed effective September 4, 1976.”
State v. Hungerford, 267 N.W.2d 258 (Wis. 1978). “” 2A Sutherland, Statutory Construction, §51.02 at 290 (4th ed., Sands, 1973). 2 Finally, the defendant argues that the concept of dangerousness contained in sec.”
State v. Temby, 322 N.W.2d 522 (Wis. Ct. App. 1982). “Sutherland, Statutory Construction, § 51.02 at 290 (4th ed., Sands, 1973). We conclude that given the construction of the term “wilfully” under the prior statute, that had the legislature wanted to require specific intent to defraud, it would have explicitly stated so.”
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. v. Kelly, 389 N.W.2d 838 (Wis. Ct. App. 1986). “Singer, 2A Sutherland on Statutes and Statutory Construction § 51.02 at 453 (Sands rev. 4th ed. 1984) (footnotes omitted).”
State v. Hanson, 295 N.W.2d 209 (Wis. Ct. App. 1980). “” We also note the language of 2A Sutherland, Statutory Construction §51.02, at 290 (4th ed., Sands, 1973), that was adopted in State v.”
Belisle v. Plunkett (In Re Plunkett), 89 B.R. 776 (Bankr. E.D. Wis. 1988). “Singer, Sutherland Statutory Construction §§ 51.02 and 51.05 (Sands 4th ed. rev. 1984).”
Wis. Stat. § 51.02(1): 2 cases
Lessard v. Schmidt, 349 F. Supp. 1078 (E.D. Wis. 1972). “1 The complaint sought declaratory and injunctive relief against the enforcement of certain portions of Wis. Stat.Ann. §§ 51.02, 51.03 and 51.04, relating to the procedure for involuntary detention and commitment of persons alleged to be suffering from mental illness.”
Lessard v. Schmidt, 379 F. Supp. 1376 (E.D. Wis. 1974). “Section 51.02, Wisconsin Statutes (1971), is further declared invalid in that it authorizes the omission of the service of the required notice; Probable Cause Hearing C.”
Wis. Stat. § 51.02(2): 1 case
Lessard v. Schmidt, 379 F. Supp. 1376 (E.D. Wis. 1974). “Section 51.02, Wisconsin Statutes (1971), is further declared invalid in that it authorizes the omission of the service of the required notice; Probable Cause Hearing C.”
Wis. Stat. § 51.02(4): 2 cases
Lessard v. Schmidt, 349 F. Supp. 1078 (E.D. Wis. 1972). “1 The complaint sought declaratory and injunctive relief against the enforcement of certain portions of Wis. Stat.Ann. §§ 51.02, 51.03 and 51.04, relating to the procedure for involuntary detention and commitment of persons alleged to be suffering from mental illness.”
State Ex Rel. Memmel v. Mundy, 249 N.W.2d 573 (Wis. 1977). “5 Sec. 51.02(4), Stats., repealed effective September 4, 1976.”
Wis. Stat. § 51.02(5): 2 cases
Lessard v. Schmidt, 349 F. Supp. 1078 (E.D. Wis. 1972). “1 The complaint sought declaratory and injunctive relief against the enforcement of certain portions of Wis. Stat.Ann. §§ 51.02, 51.03 and 51.04, relating to the procedure for involuntary detention and commitment of persons alleged to be suffering from mental illness.”
Lessard v. Schmidt, 379 F. Supp. 1376 (E.D. Wis. 1974). “Section 51.02, Wisconsin Statutes (1971), is further declared invalid in that it authorizes the omission of the service of the required notice; Probable Cause Hearing C.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.