Wisconsin Statutes
Wis. Stat. § 7.11 (2026)
Menominee county; town elections
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
7.117.11 Menominee county; town elections. The clerk shall prepare a ballot distinguishing between supervisors elected at large and by ward in any county having only one town with a part of the county board members elected by wards.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1989–2026 · leading case: State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane Cnty., 2004 WI 58 (Wis. 2004).
State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane Cnty., 2004 WI 58 (Wis. 2004). “The Legislative Reference Bureau discourages use of such provisions except under certain circumstances. Indeed a statement of legislative intent, purpose, or findings may not be included in a draft without the approval of the chief of the bureau.”
Wisconsin Prof'l Police Ass'n/Law Enf't Emp. Relations Div. v. Dane Cnty., 439 N.W.2d 625 (Wis. Ct. App. 1989). “*704 II THE COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT Section 7.11 of the collective bargaining agreement provides: The Employer agrees to employ sufficient employes to adequately man the various shifts and departments during times of vacation, sickness or other authorized absences from…”
Barland v. Eau Claire Cnty., 575 N.W.2d 691 (Wis. 1998). “07) and worker's compensation or injury leave ( see § 7.11). These provisions regulate the employment of county personnel, but do not control or commandeer it as the bumping provision of the agreement does.”
Sierra Club v. Marita, 843 F. Supp. 1526 (E.D. Wis. 1994). “1989); Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 7.11 at 100 (2d ed. 1979). Rather, for purposes of this claim, the Service is bound only by the far less precise language of the “broad spectrum” regulation itself.”
Techmaster, Inc. v. Compact Automation Prods., LLC, 462 F. Supp. 2d 932 (W.D. Wis. 2006). “Change in competitive circumstances In The Wisconsin Fair Dealership Law § 7.11, Bowen and Butler list four prerequisites for a finding of an actionable change in competitive circumstances under § 135.”
Foley Living Trust Dated November 5, 2007 v. Burger (E.D. Wis. 2025). “Section 7.11 states: Section 7.11 Right of First Refusal (a) Option to Purchase.”
Foley Living Trust Dated November 5, 2007 v. Burger (E.D. Wis. 2024). “If a member proposes to gift their units to anyone, Section 7.11(a) provides the company and other members a right of first refusal over that gift.”
Sunrise Marine, LLC v. Aqua Traction Marine, LLC (E.D. Wis. 2026). “A change in profitability may be the most obvious and common harm allegedly suffered by dealers in a WFDL action; the extent of the change being a common measure of whether a change was substantial.”
Wis. Stat. § 7.11(a): 2 cases
Foley Living Trust Dated November 5, 2007 v. Burger (E.D. Wis. 2025). “Section 7.11 states: Section 7.11 Right of First Refusal (a) Option to Purchase.”
Foley Living Trust Dated November 5, 2007 v. Burger (E.D. Wis. 2024). “If a member proposes to gift their units to anyone, Section 7.11(a) provides the company and other members a right of first refusal over that gift.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.