Wis. Stat. » CHAPTER 801 — CIVIL PROCEDURE — COMMENCEMENT OF ACTION AND VENUE
Wisconsin Statutes

Wis. Stat. § 801.07 (2026)

Jurisdiction in rem or quasi in rem, grounds for generally

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
801.07801.07 Jurisdiction in rem or quasi in rem, grounds for generally. A court of this state having jurisdiction of the subject matter may exercise jurisdiction in rem or quasi in rem on the grounds stated in this section. A judgment in rem or quasi in rem may affect the interests of a defendant in the status, property or thing acted upon only if a summons has been served upon the defendant pursuant to s. 801.12. Jurisdiction in rem or quasi in rem may be invoked in any of the following cases:
801.07(1)(1) When the subject of the action is real or personal property in this state and the defendant has or claims a lien or interest, actual or contingent, therein, or the relief demanded consists wholly or partially in excluding the defendant from any interest or lien therein. This subsection shall apply when any such defendant is unknown.
801.07(2)(2) When the action is to foreclose, redeem from or satisfy a mortgage, claim or lien upon real estate within this state.
801.07(3)(3) When the defendant has property within this state which has been attached or has a debtor within the state who has been garnisheed. Jurisdiction under this subsection may be independent of or supplementary to jurisdiction acquired under subs. (1) and (2).
801.07(4)(4) When the action is to declare property within this state a public nuisance.
801.07(5)(5) When the action is an action affecting the family under s. 767.001 (1) (a) to (d) and when the residence requirements of s. 767.301 have been met, a court having subject matter jurisdiction may exercise jurisdiction quasi in rem to determine questions of status if the respondent has been served under s. 801.11 (1). Notwithstanding s. 801.11 (intro.), the court need not have grounds for personal jurisdiction under s. 801.05 in order to make a determination of the status of a marriage under this subsection.
801.07 HistoryHistory: Sup. Ct. Order, 67 Wis. 2d 585, 597 (1975), 758; 1977 c. 418; 1979 c. 32 s. 92 (4); 1979 c. 352 s. 39; 1993 a. 213; 2001 a. 42; 2005 a. 443, s. 265.
801.07 AnnotationThis section requires that in rem actions under s. 161.555 [now s. 961.555] must be commenced against a person having an interest in property seized under s. 161.55 [now s. 961.55]. State v. One 1973 Cadillac, 95 Wis. 2d 641, 291 N.W.2d 626 (Ct. App. 1980).
801.07 AnnotationFor quasi in rem jurisdiction under sub. (5), minimum contacts between the defendant and the state are necessary. Mendez v. Hernandez-Mendez, 213 Wis. 2d 217, 570 N.W.2d 563 (Ct. App. 1997), 96-1731.
801.07 AnnotationSub. (3) applies when a settlement offer is made at least 20 days before trial. When a dispute is resolved by arbitration, there is no trial and sub. (3) does not apply. Lane v. Williams, 2000 WI App 263, 240 Wis. 2d 255, 621 N.W.2d 922, 00-0852.
801.07 AnnotationIt is apparent that the legislature intended to empower the courts with the authority to determine the status of a marriage even if personal jurisdiction over one of the parties is lacking. In adding the final sentence of sub. (5), the legislature chose not to remove the requirement of personal jurisdiction for determinations involving other property or status subject to jurisdiction under this section. Had the legislature intended to remove the requirement of personal jurisdiction for divorce decisions involving property, it could have written the amendment more expansively. Montalvo v. U.S. Title & Closing Services, LLC, 2013 WI App 8, 345 Wis. 2d 653, 827 N.W.2d 635, 12-0102.
801.07 AnnotationDiscussing the minimum contacts standard for quasi in rem jurisdiction. Shaffer v. Heitner, 433 U.S. 186, 97 S. Ct. 2569, 53 L. Ed. 2d 683 (1977).
801.07 AnnotationPosting a notice of eviction on an apartment door did not satisfy minimum requirements of due process. Greene v. Lindsey, 456 U.S. 444, 102 S. Ct. 1874, 72 L. Ed. 2d 249 (1982).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1980–2026 · leading case: In Re Marriage of Emery v. Emery, 369 N.W.2d 728 (Wis. 1985).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In Re Marriage of Emery v. Emery, 369 N.W.2d 728 (Wis. 1985). · cites it 8× “” Section 801.07 (5), Stats, requires service in compliance with sec.”
State v. One 1973 Cadillac, 291 N.W.2d 626 (Wis. Ct. App. 1980). · cites it 2× “Section 801.07 provides, inter alia, that: “[a] judgment in rem .”
In Re Marriage of Bushelman v. Bushelman, 2001 WI App 124 (Wis. Ct. App. 2001). “§ 801.07(5) provides: (5) When the action is an action affecting the family under s.”
Est. of Boyle v. Wickhem, Buell, Meier, Wickem & Southworth, S.C., 397 N.W.2d 124 (Wis. Ct. App. 1986). “See sec. 801.07, Stats. However, the service of a summons and complaint or a notice of the object of the action is a condition precedent to the valid exercise of jurisdiction in rem or quasi in rem.”
In RE MARRIAGE OF MENDEZ v. Hernandez-Mendez, 570 N.W.2d 563 (Wis. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 6× “Jose bases this argument on the fact that his action was amended to one of quasi in rem pursuant to § 801.07(5), Stats., when he narrowed his claim for relief to only a divorce.”
Midland Funding, LLC v. Mizinski, 2014 WI App 82 (Wis. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 6× “We observe that Wis. Stat. § 801.07 addresses the circumstances in which Wisconsin courts may exercise in rem or quasi in rem jurisdiction.”
Montalvo v. U.S. Title & Closing Servs., LLC, 2013 WI App 8 (Wis. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 7× “42, adding the following sentence to Wis. Stat. § 801.07 (5): Notwithstanding s.”
Legend Lake Prop. Owners Ass'n, Inc. v. Guy Keshena, 2026 WI 21 (Wis. 2026). · cites it 2× “§ 801.07 (in rem actions).11 In the Tribe’s view, an act of Congress is necessary to create an in rem exception to tribal sovereign immunity, and Congress has not so acted.”
— Wis. Stat. § 801.07(3) — 1 case
Midland Funding, LLC v. Mizinski, 2014 WI App 82 (Wis. Ct. App. 2014). “We observe that Wis. Stat. § 801.07 addresses the circumstances in which Wisconsin courts may exercise in rem or quasi in rem jurisdiction.”
— Wis. Stat. § 801.07(5) — 3 cases
In Re Marriage of Emery v. Emery, 369 N.W.2d 728 (Wis. 1985). “” Section 801.07 (5), Stats, requires service in compliance with sec.”
In Re Marriage of Bushelman v. Bushelman, 2001 WI App 124 (Wis. Ct. App. 2001). “§ 801.07(5) provides: (5) When the action is an action affecting the family under s.”
In RE MARRIAGE OF MENDEZ v. Hernandez-Mendez, 570 N.W.2d 563 (Wis. Ct. App. 1997). “Jose bases this argument on the fact that his action was amended to one of quasi in rem pursuant to § 801.07(5), Stats., when he narrowed his claim for relief to only a divorce.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.