Wisconsin Statutes

Wis. Stat. § 806.09 (2026)

Restitution in case of reversed judgment; purchaser for value

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
806.09806.09Restitution in case of reversed judgment; purchaser for value.
806.09(1)(1)If any judgment or part of a judgment is collected and such judgment is afterwards set aside or reversed, the trial court shall order the same to be restored with interest from the time of the collection, but in case a new trial is ordered the party who has collected the judgment may retain the same pending the new trial, upon giving a bond in such sum and with such sureties as the court shall order, conditioned for the restoration of the amount collected with interest from the time of collection. The order of restitution may be obtained upon proof of the facts upon notice and motion and may be enforced as a judgment. Nothing herein shall affect or impair the right or title of a purchaser for value in good faith without notice.
806.09(2)(2)Whenever in a civil action on appeal to the court of appeals or the supreme court the appellant fails to stay execution and pending the appeal the sheriff or other officer collects all or any part of the judgment appealed from, the officer collecting the judgment shall deposit the amount collected, less the officer’s fees, with the clerk of the court out of which execution issued. In case of reversal on the appeal, restitution may be made in accordance with sub. (1). In case of affirmance the clerk shall pay over the deposit to the judgment creditor on the filing of the remittitur from the court of appeals or the supreme court.
806.09 HistoryHistory: Sup. Ct. Order, 67 Wis. 2d 585, 728 (1975); 1975 c. 218; 1977 c. 187.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1985–2011 · leading case: Indianhead Motors v. Brooks, 2006 WI App 266 (Wis. Ct. App. 2006).
Indianhead Motors v. Brooks, 2006 WI App 266 (Wis. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 3× “Wis. Stat. § 806.09 . Indianhead does not argue that § 806.”
Avudria v. McGlone Mortg. Co., 2011 WI App 95 (Wis. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 2× “See Wis. Stat. § 806.09 (1) (2009-10) ("If any judgment or part of a judgment is collected and such judgment is afterwards set aside or reversed, the trial court shall order the same to be restored with interest from the time of the collection .”
McDonald v. McDonald, 2006 WI App 150 (Wis. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 2× “See Wis. Stat. § 806.09 (1) ("If any judgment or part of a judgment is collected and such judgment is afterwards set aside or reversed, the trial court shall order the same to be restored with interest from the time of the collection.”
Harvest Sav. Bank v. ROI Investments, 598 N.W.2d 571 (Wis. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 5× “We note, finally, that ROI cites § 806.09(1), STATS., in support of its claim that the trial court had authority to enter judgment in its favor for reimbursement of the overpayment.”
Herkert v. Stauber, 378 N.W.2d 704 (Wis. Ct. App. 1985). · cites it 6× “Sec. 808.07(1), Stats. If a judgment is collected and is afterwards set aside or reversed the judgment creditor must, of course, restore it with interest from the time of execution.”
Wis. Stat. § 806.09(1): 2 cases
Harvest Sav. Bank v. ROI Investments, 598 N.W.2d 571 (Wis. Ct. App. 1999). “We note, finally, that ROI cites § 806.09(1), STATS., in support of its claim that the trial court had authority to enter judgment in its favor for reimbursement of the overpayment.”
Herkert v. Stauber, 378 N.W.2d 704 (Wis. Ct. App. 1985). “Sec. 808.07(1), Stats. If a judgment is collected and is afterwards set aside or reversed the judgment creditor must, of course, restore it with interest from the time of execution.”
Wis. Stat. § 806.09(2): 1 case
Herkert v. Stauber, 378 N.W.2d 704 (Wis. Ct. App. 1985). “Sec. 808.07(1), Stats. If a judgment is collected and is afterwards set aside or reversed the judgment creditor must, of course, restore it with interest from the time of execution.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.