Wisconsin Statutes
Wis. Stat. § 809.103 (2026)
Appeals in proceedings related to prisoners
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
809.103(2)(2) The appellate court shall notify the department of justice by a procedure developed by the director of state courts in cooperation with the department of justice when the appellate court rules that an appeal or supervisory writ proceeding brought by a prisoner meets any of the following conditions:
809.103(2)(b)(b) Is used for any improper purpose, such as to harass, to cause unnecessary delay or to needlessly increase the cost of litigation.
809.103(2)(c)(c) Seeks review of a denial of monetary damages from a defendant who is immune from such relief.
809.103(3)(3) A prisoner is not relieved from paying the full filing fee related to an appeal or supervisory writ proceeding if the appellate court dismisses the appeal or supervisory writ proceeding for one of the reasons listed in sub. (2).
809.103 HistoryHistory: 1997 a. 133; Sup. Ct. Order No. 03-06A, 2005 WI 86, 280 Wis. 2d xiii; 2011 a. 2.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 1998–1999 · leading case: State Ex Rel. Bergmann v. Faust, 595 N.W.2d 75 (Wis. Ct. App. 1999).
State Ex Rel. Bergmann v. Faust, 595 N.W.2d 75 (Wis. Ct. App. 1999). “16 We had previously ordered that Bergmann had to either pay the appellate filing fee of $150 or file the documentation required for a fee waiver for an appeal under 1997 Wis.”
Taylor v. Rock Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't, 588 N.W.2d 356 (Wis. Ct. App. 1998). “They further request that, if we find this appeal frivolous, we notify the Department of Justice pursuant to § 809.103, Stats., as created by 1997 Wis.”
Wis. Stat. § 809.103(2): 1 case
State Ex Rel. Bergmann v. Faust, 595 N.W.2d 75 (Wis. Ct. App. 1999). “16 We had previously ordered that Bergmann had to either pay the appellate filing fee of $150 or file the documentation required for a fee waiver for an appeal under 1997 Wis.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.