Wisconsin Statutes
Wis. Stat. § 822.10 (2026)
Communication between courts
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
822.10(1)(1) In this section, “record” means information that is inscribed on a tangible medium or that is stored in an electronic or other medium and is retrievable in perceivable form.
822.10(2)(2) A court of this state may communicate with a court in another state concerning a proceeding arising under this chapter.
822.10(3)(3) The court may allow the parties to participate in the communication. If the parties are not able to participate in the communication, they shall be given the opportunity to present facts and legal arguments before a decision on jurisdiction is made.
822.10(4)(4) Communication between courts on schedules, calendars, court records, and similar matters may occur without informing the parties. A record need not be made of the communication.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1992–2025 · leading case: In Re Interest of Brandon SS, 507 N.W.2d 94 (Wis. 1993).
In Re Interest of Brandon SS, 507 N.W.2d 94 (Wis. 1993). “[13] Section 822.10 provides: If the court learns from information furnished by the parties pursuant to s.”
David S. v. Laura S., 507 N.W.2d 94 (Wis. 1993). “Section 822.10 provides: If the court learns from information furnished by the parties pursuant to s.”
In Re Termination of Parental Rights of Steven C., 486 N.W.2d 572 (Wis. Ct. App. 1992). “If the court learns that someone not a party to the proceeding claims visitation rights with respect to the child, sec. 822.10, Stats., requires that the person be joined as a party.”
Rosa Albina Rodriguez Vargas v. Jorge Isael Nolla (Wis. Ct. App. 2025). “§ 822.10 requires that when there is communication between a court of this state and a court of another state concerning a proceeding arising under Chapter 822 of the Wisconsin Statutes, “[i]f the parties are not able to participate in the communication, they shall be given the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.