Wisconsin Statutes
Wis. Stat. § 851.055 (2026)
Deferred marital property
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
851.055851.055 Deferred marital property. “Deferred marital property” means any property that satisfies all of the following:
851.055(1m)(1m) Is not classified as individual property or marital property under a valid marital property agreement, unless the marital property agreement provides otherwise.
851.055(3)(3) Would have been classified as marital property under ch. 766 if the property had been acquired when ch. 766 applied.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1992–2006 · leading case: Shovers v. Shovers, 2006 WI App 108 (Wis. Ct. App. 2006).
Shovers v. Shovers, 2006 WI App 108 (Wis. Ct. App. 2006). “She argues that, "[a]s a legatee under [their] Joint Will, Sylvia has an equitable ownership interest in the assets of Harold's estate," and that even without the joint will, she "has an interest that Soref's shares be declared part of the assets of Harold's estate based on her…”
Krueger v. Rodenberg, 527 N.W.2d 381 (Wis. Ct. App. 1994). “[5] Property acquired during the marriage to which the Act does not apply, but which would have been covered by the Act had the property been acquired after its enactment, is characterized as "deferred marital property.”
Est. of Kobylski v. Hellstern, 503 N.W.2d 369 (Wis. Ct. App. 1993). “Section 851.055, Stats. Any property determined not to be marital property is presumed to be deferred marital property unless the presumption is rebutted.”
In Matter of Est. of Lloyd, 487 N.W.2d 644 (Wis. Ct. App. 1992). “” Section 851.055, Stats. Whether deferred marital property exists is considered only at death, and then only in the context of the two elective rights granted a surviving spouse.”
In Matter of Est. of Moccero, 483 N.W.2d 310 (Wis. Ct. App. 1992). “, but was "deferred marital property," as defined in sec. 851.055, Stats. 1 Section 861.02(1), Stats.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.