Wisconsin Statutes
Wis. Stat. § 853.35 (2026)
Nonademption of specific gifts in certain instances
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 1988–1998 · leading case: Matter of Est. of Anderson, 432 N.W.2d 932 (Wis. Ct. App. 1988).
Matter of Est. of Anderson, 432 N.W.2d 932 (Wis. Ct. App. 1988). “This appeal involves the application of Wisconsin’s nonademption statute, sec. 853.35, Stats. Under common law ademption, if specific property given by will was sold or destroyed before the testator died, the gift failed because that property was "no longer part of the…”
Barry v. Maple Bluff Country Club, 586 N.W.2d 182 (Wis. Ct. App. 1998). “1988) (concluding that the burden of proving the proviso of § 853.35, Stats., is on the person seeking to remove circumstances from the statute's purview).”
Wis. Stat. § 853.35(1): 1 case
Matter of Est. of Anderson, 432 N.W.2d 932 (Wis. Ct. App. 1988). “This appeal involves the application of Wisconsin’s nonademption statute, sec. 853.35, Stats. Under common law ademption, if specific property given by will was sold or destroyed before the testator died, the gift failed because that property was "no longer part of the…”
Wis. Stat. § 853.35(3): 1 case
Matter of Est. of Anderson, 432 N.W.2d 932 (Wis. Ct. App. 1988). “This appeal involves the application of Wisconsin’s nonademption statute, sec. 853.35, Stats. Under common law ademption, if specific property given by will was sold or destroyed before the testator died, the gift failed because that property was "no longer part of the…”
Wis. Stat. § 853.35(7): 1 case
Matter of Est. of Anderson, 432 N.W.2d 932 (Wis. Ct. App. 1988). “This appeal involves the application of Wisconsin’s nonademption statute, sec. 853.35, Stats. Under common law ademption, if specific property given by will was sold or destroyed before the testator died, the gift failed because that property was "no longer part of the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.