Wisconsin Statutes

Wis. Stat. § 972.085 (2026)

Immunity; use standard

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
972.085972.085Immunity; use standard. Immunity from criminal or forfeiture prosecution under ss. 13.35, 17.16 (7), 77.61 (12), 93.17, 111.07 (2) (b), 128.16, 133.15, 139.20, 139.39 (5), 195.048, 196.48, 551.602 (5), 553.55 (3), 601.62 (5), 767.87 (4), 885.15, 885.24, 885.25 (2), 891.39 (2), 968.26, 972.08 (1) and 979.07 (1) and ch. 769, provides immunity only from the use of the compelled testimony or evidence in subsequent criminal or forfeiture proceedings, as well as immunity from the use of evidence derived from that compelled testimony or evidence.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1997–2012 · leading case: State v. Hall, 557 N.W.2d 778 (Wis. 1997).
State v. Hall, 557 N.W.2d 778 (Wis. 1997). · cites it 20× “Wis. Stat. § 972.085 . ¶ 46. A copy of the confidentiality provision for the Minnesota drug tax statute § 297D was attached to the bill request form for 1989 Assembly Bill 633.”
State ex rel. Nothum v. Walsh, 380 S.W.3d 557 (Mo. 2012). “” Wis. Stat. Ann. § 972.085 . Significantly, the language contained in section 513.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.