Wyoming Statutes

Wyo. Stat. § 1-30-103 (2026)

Application for writ; notice to defendant.

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WY-LEGwyoleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
The application for a writ must be by petition, in the name of
the state, on the relation of the party applying and verified by
affidavit. The court may require notice of the application to be
given to the defendant, may grant an order to show cause why it
should not be allowed, or may allow the writ without notice.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2016–2025 · leading case: Bruce B. Williams v. Laura L. Sundstrom, as Campbell Cnty. Coroner, 2016 WY 122 (Wyo. 2016).
Bruce B. Williams v. Laura L. Sundstrom, as Campbell Cnty. Coroner, 2016 WY 122 (Wyo. 2016). · cites it 2× “Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 1-30-103 (LexisNexis 2016) provides that “[t]he application for a writ [of mandamus] must be by petition, in the name of the state, on the relation of the party applying and verified by affidavit,” Mr.”
Bruce B. Williams v. Terrill R. Tharp, as Circuit Court Judge, 2017 WY 8 (Wyo. 2017). · cites it 2× “§ 1-30-103 requires that the "application for a writ [of mandamus] must be by petition, in the name of the state, on the relation of the party applying and verified by affidavit." (Emphasis added.) Mr. Williams’ petition did not comply with these requirements.”
Randy W. Stevens, Individually & as Tr. of the Randy W. Stevens Living Trust & Quality Landscape & Nursery, Inc. v. The Governing Body of the Town of Saratoga, Wyoming, a Wyoming Mun. Corp., 2025 WY 35 (Wyo. 2025). · cites it 3× “As explained above, the request for mandamus was presented as part of a motion to the district court; no affidavit was included.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.