Wyoming Statutes
Wyo. Stat. § 2-7-408 (2026)
Discharge or bequest of debt or demand not valid
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WY-LEGwyoleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
against creditors. The discharge or bequest in a will of any debt or demand of the testator against the personal representative named or any other person is not valid against the creditors of the decedent, but is a specific bequest of the debt or demand. It shall be included in the inventory and if necessary applied in the payment of the debts. If not necessary for that purpose, it shall be paid in the same manner and proportion as other specific legacies.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1
case, 2012–2012 · leading case: Hibsman v. Mullen, 287 P.3d 757 (2012).
Hibsman v. Mullen, 287 P.3d 757 (2012). “[16] Up to this point, Appellant had not complied with his statutory duty to give the district court an inventory of estate assets within the 120-day window provided by Wyo. Stat. Ann. §§ 2-7-408 (a) and 2-7-806 (Lexis-Nexis 2011).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.