Wyoming Statutes
Wyo. Stat. § 21-7-104 (2026)
Employment of continuing contract teachers on
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WY-LEGwyoleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
continuing basis; salary increases.
(a) A continuing contract teacher shall be employed by
each school district on a continuing basis from year to year
without annual contract renewal at a salary determined by the
board of trustees of each district, said salary subject to
increases from time to time as provided for in the salary
provisions adopted by the board.
(b) Any teacher hired by a Wyoming school district shall
receive credit in accordance with that district's salary
schedule for all prior years of service obtained as a teacher in
any Wyoming school district or as a teacher in the regional
developmental preschool system defined by W.S. 21-2-701(a)(iii).Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1981–2021 · leading case: Marvin Mirich v. State of Wyoming Ex Rel., Bd. of Trs. of Laramie Cnty. Sch. Dist. Two & Laramie Cnty. Sch. Dist. No. Two, 2021 WY 32 (Wyo. 2021).
Marvin Mirich v. State of Wyoming Ex Rel., Bd. of Trs. of Laramie Cnty. Sch. Dist. Two & Laramie Cnty. Sch. Dist. No. Two, 2021 WY 32 (Wyo. 2021). “]” Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 21-7-104 (a) (LexisNexis 2019); see 2019 Wyoming Laws Ch.”
Abell v. Dewey, 870 P.2d 363 (Wyo. 1994). “1976); Wyo.Stat. § 21-7-104 (1992). We have also recognized that the legislature created a property interest in continued public employment for municipal judges.”
McNeill v. Park Cnty. Sch. Dist. No. 1, 635 P.2d 818 (Wyo. 1981). “In light of § 21-7-104, W.S. 1977 3 it is apparent that a school district’s failure to terminate by March 15 constitutes a renewal of the teacher’s contract.”
Wells v. Bd. of Trs., 3 P.3d 861 (Wyo. 2000). “Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 21-7-104 (a) (Lexis 1999).”
Roberts v. Lincoln Cnty. Sch. Dist. No. One, 676 P.2d 577 (Wyo. 1984). “We will interfere with school board actions if they are arbitrary and capricious or fraudulent; however, we will not otherwise substitute our judgment.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.