Wyoming Statutes

Wyo. Stat. § 22-5-212 (2026)

When declaration of party affiliation required.

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WY-LEGwyoleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
An elector requesting a major party ballot shall declare or
change party affiliation in accordance with W.S. 22-5-214 before
receiving a party ballot. An elector may vote only the
nonpartisan ballot and if so, is not required to declare his
party affiliation. Requesting a partisan primary election ballot
constitutes a declaration of party affiliation. A change in
declaration of party affiliation shall be in accordance with the
requirements of W.S. 22-5-214 and shall be entered on the poll
list by the election judge.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1986–2007 · leading case: Clingman v. Beaver, 544 U.S. 581 (2005).
Clingman v. Beaver, 544 U.S. 581 (2005). · cites it 2× “Code § 3-1-35 (Lexis 2002); Wyo. Stat. § 22-5-212 (Lexis 1977-2003). [2] Respondents argue, for the first time before this Court, that Oklahoma election statutes other than § 1-104 make it difficult for voters to disaffiliate from their parties of first choice and register as…”
Tashjian v. Repub. Party of Connecticut, 479 U.S. 208 (1986). · cites it 2× “Code § 3-1-35 (1979); Wyo. Stat. § 22-5-212 (1977). Sixteen States allow a voter previously unaffiliated with any party to vote in a party primary if he affiliates with the party at the time of, or for the purpose of, voting in the primary.”
Murphy v. State Canvassing Bd., 12 P.3d 677 (Wyo. 2000). · cites it 2× “Wyo.Stat. Ann. § 22-5-212 (LEXIS 1999). Electors may vote only in the primary for which they have declared an affiliation.”
Washington State Repub. Party v. Logan, 377 F. Supp. 2d 907 (W.D. Wash. 2005). “Code § 3-1-35; Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 22-5-212 . Eleven states conduct open primaries.”
Mississippi State Democratic Party v. Barbour, 491 F. Supp. 2d 641 (N.D. Miss. 2007). “Rev.Stat. § 247.201; Pennsylvania, Pa. Stat.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.