Wyoming Statutes

Wyo. Stat. § 27-10-104 (2026)

Obligation of city, town or county to meet with

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WY-LEGwyoleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
agent after written notice; written contract of agreement.

It shall be the obligation of the city, town or county, through
its corporate authorities, to meet and confer in good faith with
the representative or representatives of the bargaining agent
within ten (10) days after receipt of written notice from said
bargaining agent of the request for a meeting for collective
bargaining purposes. This obligation shall include the duty to
cause any agreement resulting from negotiations to be reduced to
a written contract, provided that no such contract shall exceed
the term of two (2) years.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1986–2018 · leading case: Int'l Ass'n of Fire Fighters Local Union No. 5058 v. Gillette/Wright/Campbell Cnty. Fire Prot. Jt. Powers Bd., 421 P.3d 1059 (Wyo. 2018).
Int'l Ass'n of Fire Fighters Local Union No. 5058 v. Gillette/Wright/Campbell Cnty. Fire Prot. Jt. Powers Bd., 421 P.3d 1059 (Wyo. 2018). · cites it 8× “Wyo. Stat. Ann. §§ 27-10-104 , 109. The corporate authority then has ten days to meet with the bargaining agent.”
Int'l Ass'n of Firefighters Local Union No. 279 v. City of Cheyenne, 2013 WY 157 (Wyo. 2013). · cites it 9× “§ 27-10-101(a)(ii), does a mayor and/or city council person constitute a corporate authority authorized to negotiate with the union or is a quorum of the city council the corpo *1165 rate authority that must conduct the negotiations? Does the obligation to "meet and confer in…”
City of Casper v. Int'l Ass'n of Firefighters, Local 904, 713 P.2d 1187 (Wyo. 1986). · cites it 8× “Timely request for a meeting was made pursuant to §§ 27-10-104 and 27-10-109, and discussions relative to a 1984-1985 contract began within the ten-day period set by § 27-10-104 between representatives of appellee and three employees of the City of Casper: Kevin Burt, personnel…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.