Wyoming Statutes
Wyo. Stat. § 35-11-1103 (2026)
Property exempt from ad valorem taxation.
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WY-LEGwyoleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
The following property is exempt from ad valorem taxation pursuant to the provisions of this act and includes facilities, installations, machinery or equipment attached or unattached to real property and designed, installed and utilized primarily for the elimination, control or prevention of air, water or land pollution, or in the event such facility, installation, equipment or machinery shall also serve other beneficial purposes and use, such portion of the assessed valuation thereof as may be reasonably calculated to be necessary for and devoted to elimination, control or prevention of air, water and land pollution. The department of revenue shall determine the exempt portion on all property assessed pursuant to W.S. 39-13-102(m). The county assessor shall determine the exempt portion on all property assessed pursuant to W.S. 39-13-103(b). The determination shall not include as exempt any portion of any facilities which have value as the specific source of marketable byproducts or facilities constructed for the sole purpose of capturing nonpoint source carbon dioxide.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1985–1996 · leading case: State Dep't of Revenue & Taxation v. Pacificorp, 872 P.2d 1163 (Wyo. 1994).
State Dep't of Revenue & Taxation v. Pacificorp, 872 P.2d 1163 (Wyo. 1994). “Wyo.Stat. § 35-11-1103 (Supp.1993) provides: The following property is exempt from ad valorem taxation pursuant to the provisions of this act and includes facilities, installations, machinery or equipment attached or unattached to real property and designed, installed and…”
Laramie Cnty. Bd. of Equalization v. Wyoming State Bd. of Equalization, 915 P.2d 1184 (Wyo. 1996). “Reversing the Laramie County Board of Equalization, the Wyoming State Board of Equalization determined the equipment was primarily installed for pollution control purposes and is exempt from ad valorem taxes pursuant to Wyo.Stat. § 35-11-1103. We reverse. ISSUES ■ Appellant…”
Allied-Signal, Inc. v. Wyoming State Bd. of Equalization, 813 P.2d 214 (Wyo. 1991). “" Section 35-11-1103, W.S. 1977. (Emphasis added.”
State Bd. of Equalization v. Tenneco Oil Co., 694 P.2d 97 (Wyo. 1985). “The statute in question, § 35-11-1103, W.S. 1977, states: "The following property is exempt from ad valorem taxation pursuant to the provisions of this act and includes facilities, installations, machinery or equipment attached or unattached to real property and designed,…”
Gen. Chem. Corp. v. Wyoming State Bd. of Equalization, 819 P.2d 418 (Wyo. 1991). “We believe the substantive issues can be boiled down to the single, basic issue stated by appellee: “Did the Wyoming State Board of Equalization correctly interpret W.S. 35-11-1103 by not considering operating costs in determining the amount of value of the pollution control…”
Laramie Cty. Bd. of Equal. v. State Bd., 915 P.2d 1184 (Wyo. 1996). “The desulfurization equipment; to-wit: Sulfur Plant, Sulfur Plant Engineering SRU #2, Amine Unit, Hydrogen Plant, and Hydrotreater do not qualify for pollution control exemption under W.S. § 35-11-1103 and W.S. § 39-1-201(a)(xx), as the same were not designed, installed and…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.