Wyoming Statutes

Wyo. Stat. § 40-12-109 (2026)

Limitation of actions.

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WY-LEGwyoleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

No action may be brought under this act, except under W.S. 40-
12-106, unless the consumer bringing the action gives within the
following time limits notice in writing to the alleged violator
of the act, (a) within one (1) year after the initial discovery
of the unlawful deceptive trade practice, (b) within two (2)
years following such consumer transaction, whichever occurs
first, and unless the unlawful deceptive trade practice becomes
an uncured unlawful deceptive trade practice as defined in this
act. The notice required under this section shall state fully
the nature of the alleged unlawful deceptive trade practice and
the actual damage suffered therefrom. No action may be brought
under this act, except under W.S. 40-12-106, unless said action
is initiated within one (1) year after the furnishing of notice
as required under this section.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 5 cases, 2003–2012 · leading case: In re Pharm. Indus. Average Wholesale Price Litig., 230 F.R.D. 61 (D. Mass. 2005).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

In re Pharm. Indus. Average Wholesale Price Litig., 230 F.R.D. 61 (D. Mass. 2005). “5051; Wyo. Stat. Ann. §§ 40-12-109 , 40-12-102(a)(ix).”

Tracker Marine, L.P. v. Ogle, 108 S.W.3d 349 (Tex. App. 2003). “§ 47-18-110; Wyoming: Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 40-12-109 . 26 . See Michigan: Mich.”

In re Grand Theft Auto Video Game Consum. Litig., 251 F.R.D. 139 (S.D.N.Y. 2008). “505 (Vernon 2007); Wyo. Stat. Ann. §§ 40-12-109 , 40-12-102(a) (ix) (West 2008), of the imminence, filing, or pendency of an action for consumer fraud.”

Broderick v. Dairyland Ins. Co., 270 P.3d 684 (Okla. 2012). · cites it 3× “" Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 40-12-109 (a) (LexisNexis 2011) (emphasis added).”

In Re Toyota Motor Corp., 785 F. Supp. 2d 925 (C.D. Cal. 2011). “§ 55-2-12 (two years); Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 40-12-109 (one or two years).”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.