Wyoming Statutes

Wyo. Stat. § 40-14-505 (2026)

Limitation on garnishment.

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WY-LEGwyoleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(a)   For the purposes of this part:

          (i) "Disposable earnings" means that part of the
earnings of an individual remaining after the deduction from
those earnings of amounts required by law to be withheld; and
          (ii) "Garnishment" means any legal or equitable
procedure through which the earnings of an individual are
required to be withheld for payment of a debt.

     (b) The maximum part of the aggregate disposable earnings
of an individual for any workweek which is subjected to
garnishment to enforce payment of a judgment arising from a
consumer credit sale, consumer lease, or consumer loan may not
exceed the lesser of:

          (i) Twenty-five percent (25%) of his disposable
earnings for that week; or

          (ii) The amount by which his disposable earnings for
that week exceed thirty (30) times the federal minimum hourly
wage prescribed by section (6)(a)(1) of the Fair Labor Standards
Act of 1938, U.S.C. tit. 29, § 206(a)(1), in effect at the time
the earnings are payable;

          (iii) In the case of earnings for a pay period other
than a week, the administrator shall prescribe by rule a
multiple of the federal minimum hourly wage equivalent in effect
to that set forth in paragraph (b)(ii) of this section.

     (c) No court may make, execute, or enforce an order or
process in violation of this section.

     (d) An individual's disposable earnings shall remain
exempt to the extent provided in subsection (b) of this section
if the earnings were deposited in the individual's account with
a financial institution within twenty (20) calendar days prior
to service of a writ of garnishment against the individual's
account with the financial institution, on the day of service of
the writ or within ten (10) business days after service of the
writ. This subsection does not create any obligation on the
part of a financial institution to conduct an investigation of
the individual's account or otherwise make any determination
about a judgment creditor's rights to funds in the account other
than the financial institution's obligation to file with the
court and serve on the individual an answer to the writ of
garnishment. A judgment creditor may request that the court
issue writs of garnishment to an individual's employer and the
individual's financial institution at the same time; provided,
however, that should the judgment creditor successfully garnish
earnings as shown on an individual's pay advice, then the
remaining proceeds from such pay advice deposited into an
account with a financial institution shall be entirely exempt
from execution, notwithstanding subsection (b) of this section.

     (e) As used in this section, "financial institution" means
as defined in W.S. 13-1-401(a)(ii).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1987–2004 · leading case: Royal v. Walsh, 2004 WY 96 (Wyo. 2004).
Royal v. Walsh, 2004 WY 96 (Wyo. 2004). · cites it 12× “[¶ 6] The same is true of Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 40-14-505 (a)(ii) (LexisNexis 2003), which concerns garnishments resulting from consumer credit transactions.”
Glenn v. Glenn, 848 P.2d 819 (Wyo. 1993). · cites it 6× “]" The majority accurately recognizes that Wyo.Stat. § 40-14-505(b) (1977) has, in the Uniform Consumer Credit Code statute, a garnishment limitation proviso which does not apply to child support obligations.”
In Re Wenande, 107 B.R. 770 (Bankr. D. Wyo. 1989). · cites it 4× “W.S. § 40-14-505 15 USC § 1673 75% (X) (X) (X) Homestead As Shown P.”
Union Pac. R.R. v. Trona Valley Fed. Credit Union, 57 P.3d 1203 (Wyo. 2002). “206(a)(1), in effect at the time the earnings are payable, or, in case of earnings for any pay period other than a week, any equivalent multiple thereof prescribed by the administrator of the Wyoming Uniform Consumer Credit Code in the manner provided by W.S. 40-14-505(b)(iii).…”
Hancock v. Stockmens Bank & Trust Co., 739 P.2d 760 (Wyo. 1987). “1-17-411, or in the case of consumer credit sales, leases or loans, as provided by W.S. 40-14-505;”’ ****** The substance of this statute now is found in § l-17-102(b), W.”
— Wyo. Stat. § 40-14-505(b) — 2 cases
Glenn v. Glenn, 848 P.2d 819 (Wyo. 1993). “]" The majority accurately recognizes that Wyo.Stat. § 40-14-505(b) (1977) has, in the Uniform Consumer Credit Code statute, a garnishment limitation proviso which does not apply to child support obligations.”
Royal v. Walsh, 2004 WY 96 (Wyo. 2004). “[¶ 6] The same is true of Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 40-14-505 (a)(ii) (LexisNexis 2003), which concerns garnishments resulting from consumer credit transactions.”
— Wyo. Stat. § 40-14-505(b)(iii) — 1 case
Union Pac. R.R. v. Trona Valley Fed. Credit Union, 57 P.3d 1203 (Wyo. 2002). “206(a)(1), in effect at the time the earnings are payable, or, in case of earnings for any pay period other than a week, any equivalent multiple thereof prescribed by the administrator of the Wyoming Uniform Consumer Credit Code in the manner provided by W.S. 40-14-505(b)(iii).…”
— Wyo. Stat. § 40-14-505(c) — 1 case
Glenn v. Glenn, 848 P.2d 819 (Wyo. 1993). “]" The majority accurately recognizes that Wyo.Stat. § 40-14-505(b) (1977) has, in the Uniform Consumer Credit Code statute, a garnishment limitation proviso which does not apply to child support obligations.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.