Wyoming Statutes

Wyo. Stat. § 40-4-114 (2026)

Enjoining violations; recovery of damages.

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WY-LEGwyoleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Any person, firm, private corporation or trade
association, having a reasonably foreseeable physical and
economic causal nexus to the specific act or acts alleged to be
a violation, may maintain an action to enjoin a continuance of
any act or acts in violation of this act.

     (b) Any injured person may maintain an action for
violation of this act against the alleged violator to recover
the actual damages sustained by the injured person together with
reasonable attorneys fees and costs.

    (c)   Repealed By Laws 2009, Ch. 172, § 2.

    (d)   Repealed By Laws 2009, Ch. 172, § 2.

    (e)   Repealed By Laws 2009, Ch. 172, § 2.

    (f)   Repealed By Laws 2009, Ch. 172, § 2.

    (g)   Repealed By Laws 2009, Ch. 172, § 2.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 2007–2008 · leading case: In Re Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM) Antitrust Litig., 516 F. Supp. 2d 1072 (N.D. Cal. 2007).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

In Re Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM) Antitrust Litig., 516 F. Supp. 2d 1072 (N.D. Cal. 2007). “See Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 40-4-114 et seq. Further, plaintiffs’ complaint nowhere alleges “unscrupulous and fraudulent marketing practices.”

In Re Static Random Access Memory (SRAM) Antitrust Litig., 580 F. Supp. 2d 896 (N.D. Cal. 2008). “See Wyo. Stat. § 40-4-114. Because the Court finds that Plaintiffs’ WCPA claims are deficient as a matter of law, it dismisses them with prejudice and does not reach the other grounds on which Defendants challenge them.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.