Wyoming Statutes
Wyo. Stat. § 41-8-109 (2026)
Referendum prerequisite to establishment;
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WY-LEGwyoleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
voting; ballots; right of landowners to vote; proxies.
(a) Repealed by Laws 1998, ch. 115, § 5.
(b) All qualified electors of the district and owners of
land lying within the boundaries of the proposed district, as
determined by written authorizations as specified in W.S. 41-8-
101(f) and subsections (c) and (d) of this section, shall be
eligible to vote in the referendum. In applying provisions of
the Special District Elections Act of 1994 to this act, the
terms "elector" or "voter" shall include qualified electors and
landowners.
(c) A written authorization for voting purposes shall be
filed with the election official conducting the special district
election not later than thirty (30) days prior to the election.
(d) In examining any written authorization required or
permitted to be signed by landowners, the county clerk or
district secretary shall accept the first written authorization
filed unless prior to certification the secretary or county
clerk is furnished with written evidence, satisfactory to the
county clerk or district secretary, that a new representative
has been appointed by the owners, signed by a majority of the
persons named as owners on the previously filed written
authorization or as shown on a copy of a recorded deed attached
to the written authorization.Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 1983–1983 · leading case: Associated Enter. v. TOLTEC WATERSHED, 656 P.2d 1144 (Wyo. 1983).
Associated Enter. v. TOLTEC WATERSHED, 656 P.2d 1144 (Wyo. 1983). “§ 41-8-109, W.S. 1977. [2] The case here was commenced October 1, 1974; however, proceedings were held in abeyance until the issues raised in the 1978 case were resolved.”
Associated Enter., Inc. v. Toltec Watershed Improvement Dist., 656 P.2d 1140 (Wyo. 1983). “§ 41-8-109, W.S.1977. . The case here was commenced October 1, 1974; however, proceedings were held in abeyance until the issues raised in the 1978 case were resolved.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.