Wyoming Statutes
Wyo. Stat. § 7-12-102 (2026)
Right of district attorney to take exceptions;
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WY-LEGwyoleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
certification; rules. The district attorney may take exceptions to any opinion or decision of the court made during the prosecution of a criminal case. Before being filed in the supreme court, the bill of exceptions shall be presented to the trial court which shall certify whether the contents of the bill are correct. If certified, the trial court shall sign the bill containing the exceptions and affix the seal of the court and the bill shall be made part of the record. The bill of exceptions shall be governed by rules as shall be promulgated by the Wyoming supreme court.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 22
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1979–2024 · leading case: State v. Selig, 635 P.2d 786 (Wyo. 1981).
State v. Selig, 635 P.2d 786 (Wyo. 1981). “Upon application of the Attorney General, [1] this court allowed the filing of a bill of exceptions under the provisions of §§ 7-12-102 to 7-12-105, W.S. 1977. The bill of exceptions *788 challenges the trial court's refusal to give the lesser-included offense instruction…”
State v. Sodergren, 686 P.2d 521 (Wyo. 1984). “Originally, in the case at bar, the Attorney General petitioned for a bill of exceptions in reliance upon §§ 7-12-102 through 7-12-105, W.S. 1977, Wyoming's bill-of-exceptions statutes.”
State v. Keffer, 860 P.2d 1118 (Wyo. 1993). “§ 7-12-102 (1987). This is the only method available for the State to seek a determination of governing law in any similar, pending or future case.”
Billis v. State, 800 P.2d 401 (Wyo. 1990). “NOTES [1] W.S. 7-12-102 through 7-12-104 (June 1987 Repl.”
State v. Medrano, 67 S.W.3d 892 (Tex. Crim. App. 2002). “05 (state may appeal motion to suppress evidence, confession, or admission); Wyo. Stat. § 7-12-102 (state may challenge ruling suppression of evidence with bill of exceptions and writ of certiorari).”
Crozier v. State, 882 P.2d 1230 (Wyo. 1994). “The legislature has not authorized the State to appeal in a criminal case, and we conclude a cross-appeal is in effect the same as an appeal.”
State v. Newman, 2004 WY 41 (Wyo. 2004). “3 Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 7-12-102 to 104 (Lexis-Nexis 2003), the statutes governing bills of exception, provide as follows: § 7-12-102.”
State v. Heiner, 683 P.2d 629 (Wyo. 1984). “Having said this, the court struck the bill since it was not sealed as provided by what is now our § 7-12-102, W.S. 1977, 1983 Cum.Supp. Reference to the Majority Opinion and City of Laramie v.”
Ken v. State, 267 P.3d 567 (Wyo. 2011). “Ken a new trial, The exclusive means available to the State to challenge an adverse ruling in a criminal case is by filing a bill of exceptions in accordance with Wyo. Stat. Ann. §§ 7-12-102 and 103 (LexisNexis 2011) or by filing a petition for writ of review pursuant to W.”
State v. Steele, 620 P.2d 1026 (Wyo. 1980). “Pursuant to § 7-12-102, W.S.1977, 1 appellant-State made application to this court for permission to file a Bill of Exceptions *1027 relating to certain orders and proceedings had in the district court in this matter.”
State v. Carter, 714 P.2d 1217 (Wyo. 1986). “*1219 Pursuant to §§ 7-12-102 and 7-12-103, W.S. 1977, 1985 Cum.”
State v. Faltynowicz, 660 P.2d 368 (Wyo. 1983). “We can do that here by holding the design of §§ 7-12-102 through 7-12-105 to be applicable only in those cases where the defendant has been placed in jeopardy, and appeals can be taken by the State in all other cases.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.