Class; Adequacy; Representative

16 issues with Alabama opinions1982–2014

Assessing adequacy of class representative and conflicts of interest8 opinions · 2002–2014
Determining class membership and standing requirements6 opinions · 2002–2014
Determining commonality and typicality for class certification5 opinions · 1995–2009
Interpreting the same general neighborhood rule for medical expertsthin4 opinions · 1982–1999
Determining typicality of class representative claimsthin3 opinions · 2003–2014
Determining class definition and predominance of common issuesthin2 opinions · 1996–2006
Establishing class definition and standing requirementsthin2 opinions · 1996–2006
Evaluating class numerosity under rule 23thin1 opinions · 2011
Establishing class representative typicality requirementsthin1 opinions · 2007
Determining typicality and adequacy of class representationthin1 opinions · 2007
Determining adequacy of class representation as a factual issuethin1 opinions · 2014
Defining class scope and future class membersthin1 opinions · 1996
Assessing adequacy of class representation and choice of lawthin1 opinions · 2005
Assessing class certification numerosity, commonality, and typicalitythin1 opinions · 1997
Analyzing class certification and typicality defensesthin1 opinions · 2004
Defining general application of an action to a classthin1 opinions · 2008

Counts are Alabama courts’ opinions citing pages in each issue.

How this is built: each issue is a set of opinion pages that later courts cite for the same proposition, grouped from what the citing courts wrote. Names are machine-written from those citations; read the cases before relying on them. Search case law

Your account

Appearance

Create a free account

You’re in.

Class; Adequacy; Representative