Code of Alabama
Ala. Code § 10-8-20 (2026)
(Repealed Effective January 1, 2001) Determination of Whether Partnership Exists.
✓ official Alabama Legislature (ALISON) text, laws through the 2026 Regular Session
Repealed by Acts 1996, No. 96-528, p. 685, §1, effective January 1, 2001.
(Acts 1971, No. 1513, p. 2609, §7.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1991–2006 · leading case: Wood v. Phillips, 849 So. 2d 951 (Ala. 2002).
Wood v. Phillips, 849 So. 2d 951 (Ala. 2002). “Adderhold, supra; see also Ala.Code 1975, § 10-8-20. This Court, in Waters v.”
Savers Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Amberley Huntsville, Ltd., 934 F.2d 1201 (11th Cir. 1991). “Appellants also argue that because Savers agreed to accept as payment a percentage of the value of the mortgaged property, Savers agreed to accept “a share of the profits” for purposes of Ala.Code § 10-8-20(4) (1975), which provides that “[rjeceipt by a person of a share of the…”
Connors v. Ryan's Coal Co., 923 F.2d 1461 (11th Cir. 1991). “Butler, 540 So.2d 736, 739 (Ala.1989). Relevant indicia of a partnership include: intent and agreement to be partners, sharing the profits and losses, and sharing management and community of interest.”
Norman v. Montgomery Wholesale Lumber, 678 So. 2d 1110 (Ala. Civ. App. 1996). “1990) (citing § 10-8-20, Ala.Code 1975, and McCrary v. Butler, 540 So.”
Hornsby v. Elkins, 958 So. 2d 869 (Ala. 2006). “” The only evidence Elkins has provided of an agreement between Mack Hornsby and Phillip Hornsby is the inference from Phillip’s participation in the decision not to pay the workers’ compensation award, the timing of Phillip’s decision to incorporate Phil’s Motor Service in…”
Ala. Code § 10-8-20(4): 1 case
Savers Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Amberley Huntsville, Ltd., 934 F.2d 1201 (11th Cir. 1991). “Appellants also argue that because Savers agreed to accept as payment a percentage of the value of the mortgaged property, Savers agreed to accept “a share of the profits” for purposes of Ala.Code § 10-8-20(4) (1975), which provides that “[rjeceipt by a person of a share of the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.