Code of Alabama
Ala. Code § 10-8-92 (2026)
(Repealed Effective January 1, 2001) Order of Court.
✓ official Alabama Legislature (ALISON) text, laws through the 2026 Regular Session
Repealed by Acts 1996, No. 96-528, p. 685, §1, effective January 1, 2001.
(Acts 1971, No. 1513, p. 2609, §32.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1980–1999 · leading case: Vance v. Huff, 568 So. 2d 745 (Ala. 1990).
Vance v. Huff, 568 So. 2d 745 (Ala. 1990). “Vance also contends that he was entitled to a court-ordered dissolution of the partnership under Ala. Code 1975, § 10-8-92. That statute lists six circumstances that would require a dissolution, and Vance has not specified which, if any, of those circumstances apply to his case.”
Bertolla v. Bill, 774 So. 2d 497 (Ala. 1999). “2d 713 (1941) (interpreting a provision identical to § 10-8-92, Alabama Partnership Act). The evidence also supports judicial dissolution on the ground of Andy's misconduct.”
Myrick v. Gladish, 690 So. 2d 435 (Ala. Civ. App. 1997). “" Such a finding allows for a dissolution pursuant to § 10-8-92(a)(4). The Myricks correctly argue that when a partnership agreement does not fix a time for continuance, a partnership at will is created, and that such a partnership is terminable at the will of any partner.”
Jebeles v. Costellos, 391 So. 2d 1024 (Ala. 1980). “Code 1975, § 10-8-91b (1)b: Dissolution is caused: (1) . . . . . . . . b. By the express will of any partner when no definite term or particular undertaking is specified.”
Cox v. F & S, 489 So. 2d 516 (Ala. 1986). “See § 10-8-92, Code 1975. Alabama law provides that “a general partner of a limited partnership has the rights and powers and is subject to the restrictions and liabilities of a partner in a partnership without limited partners.”
Ala. Code § 10-8-92(a): 1 case
Bertolla v. Bill, 774 So. 2d 497 (Ala. 1999). “2d 713 (1941) (interpreting a provision identical to § 10-8-92, Alabama Partnership Act). The evidence also supports judicial dissolution on the ground of Andy's misconduct.”
Ala. Code § 10-8-92(a)(3): 1 case
Bertolla v. Bill, 774 So. 2d 497 (Ala. 1999). “2d 713 (1941) (interpreting a provision identical to § 10-8-92, Alabama Partnership Act). The evidence also supports judicial dissolution on the ground of Andy's misconduct.”
Ala. Code § 10-8-92(a)(4): 2 cases
Bertolla v. Bill, 774 So. 2d 497 (Ala. 1999). “2d 713 (1941) (interpreting a provision identical to § 10-8-92, Alabama Partnership Act). The evidence also supports judicial dissolution on the ground of Andy's misconduct.”
Myrick v. Gladish, 690 So. 2d 435 (Ala. Civ. App. 1997). “" Such a finding allows for a dissolution pursuant to § 10-8-92(a)(4). The Myricks correctly argue that when a partnership agreement does not fix a time for continuance, a partnership at will is created, and that such a partnership is terminable at the will of any partner.”
Ala. Code § 10-8-92(a)(6): 1 case
Myrick v. Gladish, 690 So. 2d 435 (Ala. Civ. App. 1997). “" Such a finding allows for a dissolution pursuant to § 10-8-92(a)(4). The Myricks correctly argue that when a partnership agreement does not fix a time for continuance, a partnership at will is created, and that such a partnership is terminable at the will of any partner.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.