Code of Alabama

Ala. Code § 11-43-3 (2026)

Election, Etc., of Treasurer, Clerk, Etc., in Cities Having More Than 6,000 Inhabitants; Consolidation or Abolishment of Offices.

✓ official Alabama Legislature (ALISON) text, laws through the 2026 Regular Session
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaAla. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) In cities having a population of more than 6,000, there shall be elected by the council, at its first regular meeting or as soon thereafter as practicable, a city treasurer and a city clerk, who shall hold office until the next general election and until their successors are elected and qualified, and such council may elect an auditor, and any officers whose election is required by ordinance, and, except as otherwise provided, the council shall have authority to fix the terms of office, prescribe their duties, and fix the salaries of the officers. The council may, by ordinance, require the city treasurer and the city clerk to be residents of the city. Except as provided in subsection (b), the council, by a two-thirds vote of the members elected, by and with the consent of the mayor, may consolidate two or more of the offices and may abolish any of the offices; provided, that the term of office of no incumbent shall be diminished.

(b) The consent of the mayor is not necessary to consolidate or abolish offices pursuant to subsection (a) if the mayor is operating pursuant to Section 11-43-2 as it relates to the legislative functions of the mayor in cities and towns having a population of 12,000 or more but less than 25,000 inhabitants according to the most recent or any subsequent federal decennial census.

(Code 1907, §1066; Code 1923, §1758; Code 1940, T. 37, §405; Acts 1984, No. 84-296, p. 661, §1; Act 2018-281, §1.)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2011–2011 · leading case: Scott v. Coachman, 73 So. 3d 607 (Ala. 2011).
Scott v. Coachman, 73 So. 3d 607 (Ala. 2011). “, §§ 11-43-3 and -4, Ala.Code 1975 (described in the main opinion).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.