It is no defense to prosecution for perjury:
(1) That the oath was administered in an irregular manner.
(2) That there was some irregularity in the appointment or qualification of the person who administered the oath, if the taking of the oath was required or authorized by law.
(3) That the document was not sworn to if the document contains a recital that it was made under oath, the declarant was aware of the recital when he signed the document and the document contains the signed jurat of a public servant authorized to administer oaths.
(4) That the defendant mistakenly believed the false statement to be immaterial.
(5) That the statement was inadmissible under the law of evidence.
(Acts 1977, No. 607, p. 812, §4930.)
Notes of Decisions
Ankor Energy, LLC v. Kelly, 271 So. 3d 798 (Ala. 2018).
· cites it 2× “The Commentary to § 13A-10-108 provides, in pertinent part: "Subdivision (3) is designed to prevent a person from escaping conviction for perjury simply because the document was not actually sworn to, even though the document contains a recital that it was made under oath.”
Ala. Code § 13A-10-108(3): 1 case
Ankor Energy, LLC v. Kelly, 271 So. 3d 798 (Ala. 2018).
“The Commentary to § 13A-10-108 provides, in pertinent part: "Subdivision (3) is designed to prevent a person from escaping conviction for perjury simply because the document was not actually sworn to, even though the document contains a recital that it was made under oath.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.