The court shall determine and may at any time modify the conditions of probation. The conditions of probation shall include, but are not limited to, all of the following:
(1) Avoid injurious or vicious habits.
(2) Avoid persons or places of disreputable or harmful character.
(3) Report to the probation officer as directed.
(4) Permit the probation officer to visit him or her at his or her home or elsewhere.
(5) Work faithfully at suitable employment as far as possible.
(6) Remain within a specified place.
(7) Pay the fine imposed or costs or any portions of fines or costs, as the court may determine, and in installments as the court may direct.
(8) Make reparation or restitution to the aggrieved party for the damage or loss caused by his or her offense in an amount to be determined by the court.
(9) Support his or her dependents to the best of his or her ability.
(10)a. Submit to behavioral treatment, substance abuse treatment, GPS monitoring, or any other treatment as deemed necessary by the court or supervising probation officer.
b. It shall be a Class D felony for any individual to knowingly alter, disable, deactivate, tamper with, remove, damage, or destroy any device used to facilitate electronic monitoring under this subdivision.
(11) The probationer may not buy, own, or possess a firearm in violation of federal law or in violation of Section 13A-11-72.
(Acts 1939, No. 278, p. 434; Code 1940, T. 42, §22; Act 2015-185, p. 476, §3; Act 2021-249, §1; Act 2024-107, §1.)
Notes of Decisions
Moore v. City of Leeds, 1 So. 3d 145 (Ala. Crim. App. 2008).
· cites it 6× “" In addition, § 15-22-52, Ala.Code 1975, provides as follows: "The court shall determine and may at any time modify the conditions of probation and may include among them the following or any other conditions.”
Bowers v. State, 565 So. 2d 1203 (Ala. Crim. App. 1990).
· cites it 5× “First, the language of § 15-22-52, Code of Alabama 1975, fails to reveal any legislative attempt to circumscribe or define the discretionary sentencing powers conferred on the circuit court.”
Long v. State, 530 So. 2d 868 (Ala. Crim. App. 1987).
· cites it 2× “Alabama Code 1975, § 15-22-52, provides that as a condition of probation the trial court may order the probationer to “[m]ake reparation or restitution to the aggrieved party for the damage or loss caused by his offense in an amount to be determined by the court.”
Crutcher v. State, 439 So. 2d 725 (Ala. Crim. App. 1983).
“Although Section 15-22-52, Alabama Code 1975, states that payment of fine and costs may be made a condition of suspension of sentence or probation, in State v.”
Stutts v. State, 897 So. 2d 428 (Ala. Crim. App. 2004).
· cites it 2× “Acts 80-588 (Codified at Code 1975, § 15-18-65 through § 15-18-77 (1982 Repl.”
Killough v. State, 434 So. 2d 849 (Ala. Crim. App. 1982).
· cites it 3× “” Ala.Code § 15-22-52(8) (1975). See also Ala.”
Williams v. State, 624 So. 2d 661 (Ala. Crim. App. 1993).
““Code 1975, § 15-22-52(8). The Code defines ‘restitution’ as: “ ‘[flull, partial or nominal payment of pecuniary damages to the victim or to its equivalent in services performed or work or labor done for the benefit of the victim as determined by the court of record,’ “while…”
Henton v. State, 733 So. 2d 914 (Ala. Crim. App. 1998).
“§ 15-22-52, Ala.Code 1975; Gilliland v. State, 712 So.”
Mize v. City of Gadsden, 575 So. 2d 1242 (Ala. Crim. App. 1991).
· cites it 4× “In fact, a court “may at any time modify the condi *1244 tions of probation,” § 15-22-52. The denial of the motion for revocation did not prevent the trial judge from modifying appellant’s probation.”
— Ala. Code § 15-22-52(6) — 2 cases
Bowers v. State, 565 So. 2d 1203 (Ala. Crim. App. 1990).
“First, the language of § 15-22-52, Code of Alabama 1975, fails to reveal any legislative attempt to circumscribe or define the discretionary sentencing powers conferred on the circuit court.”
Mize v. City of Gadsden, 575 So. 2d 1242 (Ala. Crim. App. 1991).
“In fact, a court “may at any time modify the condi *1244 tions of probation,” § 15-22-52. The denial of the motion for revocation did not prevent the trial judge from modifying appellant’s probation.”
— Ala. Code § 15-22-52(8) — 3 cases
Stutts v. State, 897 So. 2d 428 (Ala. Crim. App. 2004).
“Acts 80-588 (Codified at Code 1975, § 15-18-65 through § 15-18-77 (1982 Repl.”
Killough v. State, 434 So. 2d 849 (Ala. Crim. App. 1982).
“” Ala.Code § 15-22-52(8) (1975). See also Ala.”
Williams v. State, 624 So. 2d 661 (Ala. Crim. App. 1993).
““Code 1975, § 15-22-52(8). The Code defines ‘restitution’ as: “ ‘[flull, partial or nominal payment of pecuniary damages to the victim or to its equivalent in services performed or work or labor done for the benefit of the victim as determined by the court of record,’ “while…”
— Ala. Code § 15-22-52(9) — 1 case
Moore v. City of Leeds, 1 So. 3d 145 (Ala. Crim. App. 2008).
“" In addition, § 15-22-52, Ala.Code 1975, provides as follows: "The court shall determine and may at any time modify the conditions of probation and may include among them the following or any other conditions.”
— Ala. Code § 15-22-52(a) — 1 case
Mize v. City of Gadsden, 575 So. 2d 1242 (Ala. Crim. App. 1991).
“In fact, a court “may at any time modify the condi *1244 tions of probation,” § 15-22-52. The denial of the motion for revocation did not prevent the trial judge from modifying appellant’s probation.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.