Code of Alabama
Ala. Code § 15-9-80 (2026)
Short Title.
✓ official Alabama Legislature (ALISON) text, laws through the 2026 Regular Session
This article may be cited as the Uniform Mandatory Disposition of Detainers Act.
(Acts 1978, No. 590, p. 693, §2.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1979–2025 · leading case: Ex parte Springer, 619 So. 2d 1267 (Ala. 1992).
Ex parte Springer, 619 So. 2d 1267 (Ala. 1992). “The issue is whether the Uniform Mandatory Disposition of Detainers Act (§§ 15-9-80 through -88) addresses two different subject matters and thereby violates Art.”
State v. Wood, 924 S.W.2d 342 (Tenn. 1996). “Ala. Code § 15-9-80 (1995). [6] This Court has held that under the Compact, the defendant has the burden of giving notice to the receiving state of his or her request under Article III of the Compact for prompt disposition of the charges.”
Goodson v. State, 588 So. 2d 509 (Ala. Crim. App. 1991). “The appellant further argues, in regard to his claim that he was denied a speedy trial, that the trial court erred in not applying § 15-9-80, Code of Alabama 1975, to him. (The appellant was a Bullock County, Alabama, inmate who had several untried indictments in Houston County,…”
State ex rel. Kemp v. Hodge, 629 S.W.2d 353 (Mo. 1982). “Ala.Code §§ 15-9-80 to -88 (Cum.Supp.1981); 17 Ariz.”
Turner v. State, 378 So. 2d 1173 (Ala. Crim. App. 1979). “[2] Georgia authorities advised Boswell to begin proceedings under the Uniform Mandatory Disposition of Detainers Act, §§ 15-9-80 through 88, Code of Alabama 1975, which was done on October 2, 1978.”
James Irvin Tyree v. J.D. White, 796 F.2d 390 (11th Cir. 1986). “Appellant claims that the state violated his right to speedy trial by failing to try him within ninety days of his request, pursuant to the Alabama Uniform Mandatory Disposition of Detainer Act, Ala.Code § 15-9-80 et. seq. Appellant acknowledges that the courts of Alabama would…”
Morrow v. State, 675 So. 2d 89 (Ala. Crim. App. 1995). “Specifically, the appellant contends that there has been no final disposition of the detainer filed againát him in Florida as required by the Uniform Mandatory Disposition of Detainers Act, § 15-9-80 et seq., Code of Alabama 1975. The state filed a motion to dismiss, stating:…”
Manning v. State, 612 So. 2d 1262 (Ala. Crim. App. 1992). “Section 15-9-80 through § 15-9-88, Code of Alabama 1975.”
Mayes v. State, 612 So. 2d 1328 (Ala. Crim. App. 1992). “The appellant contends that because of an alleged violation of the Uniform Mandatory Disposition of Detainers Act (UMD-DA), §§ 15-9-80 through -88, Code of Alabama 1975, the circuit court lost jurisdiction over his ease.”
State v. Bennett, 727 So. 2d 863 (Ala. Crim. App. 1997). “While the petition is not in the record, an unsigned memorandum brief in the record filed by Bennett in support of the petition indicates that there were two grounds for relief stated in the petition: (1) that he was prosecuted in violation of the Uniform Mandatory Disposition…”
Desmond Rashad Whittaker v. State of Alabama (Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court, Bessemer Div.: CC-18-528), 428 So. 3d 575 (Ala. Crim. App. 2025). “Before pleading guilty, Whittaker preserved and CR-2023-0900 reserved for appellate review his argument that the trial court had erred in denying his motion to dismiss the indictment because the State had failed to comply with the Uniform Mandatory Disposition of Detainers Act,…”
Holloway v. State, 378 So. 2d 761 (Ala. Crim. App. 1979). “Code of Alabama 1975, § 15-9-80 through § 15-9-88.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.