Code of Alabama

Ala. Code § 16-24-11 (2026)

Cancellation of Contracts - by Teacher.

✓ official Alabama Legislature (ALISON) text, laws through the 2026 Regular Session
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaAla. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Repealed by Act 2011-270, p. 494, §14, effective July 1, 2011.

(Acts 1939, No. 499, p. 759, §9; Code 1940, T. 52, §361(1); Acts 1949, No. 250, p. 373, §1; Acts 1953, No. 773, p. 1040, §1; Acts 1973, No. 1079, p. 1835, §1.)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1978–1994 · leading case: Ex parte Jackson, 625 So. 2d 425 (Ala. 1993).
Ex parte Jackson, 625 So. 2d 425 (Ala. 1993). · cites it 7× “Jackson and amicus curiae, the Alabama Education Association ("the AEA"), contend that Fairfield's construction of § 16-24-12 is inconsistent with this Court's interpretation of § 16-24-11, which contains the same phrase in the context of the teacher's duties vis-à-vis the board…”
Ex parte Hayes, 405 So. 2d 366 (Ala. 1981). · cites it 4× “They are §§ 16-24-11 and 16-24-12 of the Code of Alabama, 1975.”
Jackson v. Alabama State Tenure Comm'n, 625 So. 2d 425 (Ala. 1992). · cites it 7× “Jackson and amicus curiae, the Alabama Education Association (“the AEA”), contend that Fairfield’s construction of § 16-24-12 is inconsistent with this Court’s interpretation of § 16-24-11, which contains the same phrase in the context of the teacher’s duties vis-a-vis the board…”
Estill v. Alabama State Tenure Com'n, 650 So. 2d 890 (Ala. Civ. App. 1994). · cites it 2× “…and "school term" in § 16-24-2; "succeeding year" in § 16-24-4; "succeeding year" in § 16-24-5; "school term" in § 16-24-11; "succeeding school year" and "term of the school" in § 16-24-12; and "school year" in § 16-24-13. In reading these statutes, it becomes obvious that…”
Hayes v. Mobile Cnty. Bd. of Sch. Commissioners, 405 So. 2d 366 (Ala. 1981). · cites it 4× “They are §§ 16-24-11 and 16-24-12 of the Code of Alabama, 1975.”
Holman v. Alabama State Tenure Comm'n, 363 So. 2d 101 (Ala. Civ. App. 1978). · cites it 2× “The Board of Education, on September 20,1977, attempted to ratify the action of the superintendent. It is the position of the teacher that a county school superintendent is not lawfully empowered to accept an offer of resignation by a tenured teacher by virtue of § 16-24-11,…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.