The Legislature of the State of Alabama declares that it is the public policy of the State of Alabama that a certificate of need program be administered in the state to assure that only those health care services and facilities found to be in the public interest shall be offered or developed in the state. It is the purpose of the Legislature in enacting this article to prevent the construction of unnecessary and inappropriate health care facilities through a system of mandatory reviews of new institutional health services, as the same are defined in this article.
(Acts 1977, 1st Ex. Sess., No. 82, p. 1509, §1; Acts 1982, 2nd Ex. Sess., No. 82-770, p. 249, §2.)
Notes of Decisions
Prime Lithotripter Oper. v. Lithomedtech of Alabama, LLC, 855 So. 2d 1085 (Ala. Civ. App. 2001).
“In addressing the argument that CON review is not necessary for LithoMedTech and UroVenture, we note that § 22-21-261 states that the public policy sought to be served by the CON program is: "[T]o assure that only those health care services and facilities found to be in the…”
Pleasure Island Ambulatory Surgery Ctr., LLC v. State Health Plan. & Dev. Agency, 38 So. 3d 739 (Ala. Civ. App. 2008).
“Section 22-21-261, Ala. Code 1975, provides, in pertinent part: “[I]t is the public policy of the State of Alabama that a [CON] program be administered in the state to assure that only those health care services and facilities found to be in the public interest shall be offered…”
Affinity Hosp., LLC v. Brookwood Health Servs. Inc., 143 So. 3d 208 (Ala. Civ. App. 2013).
“Section 22-21-261, Ala.Code 1975, provides: "The Legislature of the State of Alabama declares that it is the public policy of the State of Alabama that a certificate of need program be administered in the state to assure that only those health care services and facilities found…”
Sacred Heart Health Sys., Inc. v. Infirmary Health Sys., 155 So. 3d 969 (Ala. Civ. App. 2010).
· cites it 2× “” Ala.Code 1975, § 22-21-261. To allow without CON review the development of a healthcare facility intended to house not only physicians’ offices but also an ambulatory-surgery center, a laboratory, and a rehabilitation center, would undermine the purposes of the CON statutes.”
Foley Hosp. Corp. v. Gulf Health Hospitals, Inc., 157 So. 3d 925 (Ala. Civ. App. 2014).
“Code 1975, states: ‘“The Legislature of the State of Alabama declares that it is the public policy of the State of Alabama that a certificate of need program be administered in the state to assure that only those health care services and facilities found to be in the public…”
HealthSouth of Alabama, LLC v. Shelby Ridge Acquisition Corp., 207 So. 3d 45 (Ala. Civ. App. 2016).
· cites it 2× “As these cases painfully illustrate, the SHPDA and the CON system utterly fail to ensure that “only those health care services and facilities found to be in the public interest shall be offered or developed in the state,” Ala.Code 1975, § 22-21-261, and that the State Health…”
Montgomery Rehab. Hosp. v. HEALTH Plan., 610 So. 2d 403 (Ala. Civ. App. 1992).
“§ 22-21-261, Ala.Code 1975. All CON applications are reviewed by SHPA, which may, upon making certain required findings, grant or deny an application.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.