Code of Alabama

Ala. Code § 26-10A-31 (2026)

Confidentiality of Records, Hearing; Parties.

✓ official Alabama Legislature (ALISON) text, current July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaAla. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

THIS SECTION REPEALED BY ACT 2023-92, EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2024.

(Acts 1990, No. 90-554, p. 912, §30; Act 2000-794, p. 1869, §1.)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 2001–2018 · leading case: K.L.R. v. K.G.S., 264 So. 3d 65 (Ala. Civ. App. 2018).
K.L.R. v. K.G.S., 264 So. 3d 65 (Ala. Civ. App. 2018). · cites it 7× “On July 21, 2015, the adoptive mother filed a brief in support of her pending motions, arguing that the birth mother's public disclosures of the adoption matters violated § 26-10A-31, Ala. Code 1975. While Druhan was the appointed probate judge in the case, the probate court…”
S.C.W. v. C.B., 826 So. 2d 825 (Ala. Civ. App. 2001). “During this proceeding, the Elmore County probate judge, contrary to § 26-10A-31, ordered that the identity of the potential adoptive parents and their residence be disclosed in open court.”
K.L.R. v. K.G.S., 264 So. 3d 65 (Ala. Civ. App. 2018). · cites it 7× “On July 21, 2015, the adoptive mother filed a brief in support of her pending motions, arguing that the birth mother's public disclosures of the adoption matters violated § 26-10A-31, Ala. Code 1975. While Druhan was the appointed probate judge in the case, the probate court…”
State Dep't of Human Resources v. Campbell, 843 So. 2d 193 (Ala. Civ. App. 2002). · cites it 6× “; Ala.Code 1975, § 26-10A-31(f); and Ala.Code 1975, § 26-10A-31 comment.”
Scw v. Cb, 826 So. 2d 825 (Ala. Civ. App. 2001). “During this proceeding, the Elmore County probate judge, contrary to § 26-10A-31, ordered that the identity of the potential adoptive parents and their residence be disclosed in open court.”
— Ala. Code § 26-10A-31(f) — 1 case
State Dep't of Human Resources v. Campbell, 843 So. 2d 193 (Ala. Civ. App. 2002). “; Ala.Code 1975, § 26-10A-31(f); and Ala.Code 1975, § 26-10A-31 comment.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.