Code of Alabama
Ala. Code § 26-10A-4 (2026)
Venue.
✓ official Alabama Legislature (ALISON) text, laws through the 2026 Regular Session
THIS SECTION REPEALED BY ACT 2023-92, EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2024.
(Acts 1990, No. 90-554, p. 912, §4, Act 98-101, p. 118, §1.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 2001–2015 · leading case: J.L.L. v. Jefferson Cnty. Dep't of Human Resources, 127 So. 3d 433 (Ala. Civ. App. 2012).
J.L.L. v. Jefferson Cnty. Dep't of Human Resources, 127 So. 3d 433 (Ala. Civ. App. 2012). “” Ala.Code 1975, § 26-10A-4. The aunt and the uncle argue that their residence in the State of Alabama, coupled with the consent of the child’s parents, is sufficient to afford Alabama courts jurisdiction over the adoption proceedings as to the child.”
C.V. v. J.M.J., 810 So. 2d 700 (Ala. 2001). “” See § 26-10A-4(7). These proceedings predate those amendments; therefore, those amendments are not applicable here.”
Alabama Dep't of Human Resources v. B.V., 59 So. 3d 700 (Ala. Civ. App. 2010). “Section 26-10A-4, Ala.Code 1975, provides that venue for an adoption petition is proper in the county in.”
I.B. v. T.N., 194 So. 3d 221 (Ala. Civ. App. 2015). “, and the child reside in Montgomery County, venue was proper in Elmore County pursuant to subsection (3) of § 26-10A-4 because the Alabama Department of Human Resources maintains an office in Elmore County.”
Ex Parte CV, 810 So. 2d 700 (Ala. 2001). “" See § 26-10A-4(7). These proceedings predate those amendments; therefore, those amendments are not applicable here.”
Ala. Code § 26-10A-4(3): 1 case
I.B. v. T.N., 194 So. 3d 221 (Ala. Civ. App. 2015). “, and the child reside in Montgomery County, venue was proper in Elmore County pursuant to subsection (3) of § 26-10A-4 because the Alabama Department of Human Resources maintains an office in Elmore County.”
Ala. Code § 26-10A-4(7): 2 cases
C.V. v. J.M.J., 810 So. 2d 700 (Ala. 2001). “” See § 26-10A-4(7). These proceedings predate those amendments; therefore, those amendments are not applicable here.”
Ex Parte CV, 810 So. 2d 700 (Ala. 2001). “" See § 26-10A-4(7). These proceedings predate those amendments; therefore, those amendments are not applicable here.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.