Code of Alabama
Ala. Code § 26-23-3 (2026)
Felony Conviction.
✓ official Alabama Legislature (ALISON) text, current July 2026
Any physician who knowingly performs a partial-birth abortion within this state and thereby kills a human fetus shall be guilty of a Class C felony and upon conviction thereof shall be punished as prescribed by law.
(Acts 1997, No. 97-485, p. 843, §3.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1998–2014 · leading case: Summit Med. Assocs., P.C. v. James, 984 F. Supp. 1404 (M.D. Ala. 1998).
Summit Med. Assocs., P.C. v. James, 984 F. Supp. 1404 (M.D. Ala. 1998). “” § 26-23-2(3). Neither the term “partial-birth abortion,” nor the foregoing definition, is generally accepted in the medical community.”
Ankrom v. State, 152 So. 3d 373 (Ala. Crim. App. 2011). “Ankrom specifically points to § 26-23-3, Ala.Code 1975, as an example to support her argument.”
Summit Med. Assocs., P.C. v. Siegelman, 130 F. Supp. 2d 1307 (M.D. Ala. 2001). “See 1975 Ala. Code § 26-23-3 . A physician convicted under the provision may face revocation of his or her professional license.”
Summit Med. Assocs., P.C. v. Pryor, 180 F.3d 1326 (11th Cir. 1999). “The partial-birth abortion statute prohibits any physician from “knowingly” performing a “partial-birth abortion,” 2 Ala.Code § 26-23-3, defined as “[a]n abortion in which the person performing the abortion partially vaginally delivers a living fetus be *1330 fore killing the…”
Hicks v. State, 153 So. 3d 53 (Ala. 2014). “Hicks also argues that the legislature’s intended definition of the word “child” in the chemical-endangerment statute is evidenced by Alabama’s partial-birth-abortion statute, § 26-23-3, Ala.Code 1975, which refers to an unborn child as “a human fetus” as opposed to “a child.”
Summit Med. Assocs. v. James (11th Cir. 1999). “The partial-birth abortion statute prohibits any physician from “knowingly” performing a “partial-birth abortion,”2 Ala. Code § 26-23-3 , defined as “[a]n abortion in which 1 The effective dates of these statutes were August 1, 1997 and August 12, 1997, respectively.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.