Ala. Code
Code of Alabama

Ala. Code § 30-3B-308 (2026)

Expedited Enforcement of Child Custody Determination.

✓ official Alabama Legislature (ALISON) text, laws through the 2026 Regular Session
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaAla. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) A petition under this article must be verified. Certified copies of all orders sought to be enforced and of any order confirming registration must be attached to the petition. A copy of a certified copy of an order may be attached instead of the original.

(b) A petition for enforcement of a child custody determination must state:

(1) Whether the court that issued the determination identified the jurisdictional basis it relied upon in exercising jurisdiction and, if so, what the basis was;

(2) Whether the determination for which enforcement is sought has been vacated, stayed, or modified by a court whose decision must be enforced under this chapter and, if so, identify the court, the case number, and the nature of the proceeding;

(3) Whether any proceeding has been commenced that could affect the current proceeding, including proceedings relating to domestic violence, protective orders, termination of parental rights, and adoptions and, if so, identify the court, the case number, and the nature of the proceeding;

(4) The present physical address of the child and the respondent, if known;

(5) Whether relief in addition to the immediate physical custody of the child and attorney’s fees is sought and, if so, the relief sought; and

(6) If the child custody determination has been registered and confirmed under Section 30-3B-305, the date and place of registration.

(c) Upon the filing of a petition, the court shall issue an order directing the respondent to appear in person with or without the child at a hearing and may enter any order necessary to ensure the safety of the parties and the child. The hearing must be held on the next judicial day after service of the order unless that date is impossible. In that event, the court shall hold the hearing on the first judicial day possible. The court may extend the date of hearing at the request of the petitioner.

(d) An order issued under subsection (c) must state the time and place of the hearing and advise the respondent that at the hearing the court will order that the petitioner may take immediate physical custody of the child and the payment of fees, costs, and expenses under Section 30-3B-312, and may schedule a hearing to determine whether further relief is appropriate, unless the respondent appears and establishes that:

(1) The child custody determination has not been registered and confirmed under Section 30-3B-305, and that:

a. The issuing court did not have jurisdiction under Article 2;

b. The child custody determination for which enforcement is sought has been vacated, stayed, or modified by a court having jurisdiction to do so under Article 2;

c. The respondent was entitled to notice, but notice was not given in accordance with the standards of Section 30-3B-108, in the proceedings before the court that issued the order for which enforcement is sought; or

(2) The child custody determination for which enforcement is sought was registered and confirmed under Section 30-3B-304, but has been vacated, stayed, or modified by a court of a state having jurisdiction to do so under Article 2.

(Act 99-438, p. 866, §1.)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2011–2016 · leading case: Larose v. Larose, 71 So. 3d 651 (Ala. Civ. App. 2011).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Larose v. Larose, 71 So. 3d 651 (Ala. Civ. App. 2011). · cites it 10× “The paternal grandparents also requested expedited enforcement of the custody determination under Ala.Code 1975, § 30-3B-308; in their enforcement petition, as required by § 30-3B-308(b)(3), the paternal grandparents apprised the court of the PFA restricting the paternal…”
Hammack v. Moxcey, 220 So. 3d 1053 (Ala. Civ. App. 2016). · cites it 4× “See Ala.Code 1975, § 30-3B-308(d)(1)c. In this case, the mother presented only her affidavit as evidence to support her position.”
LaRose v. LaRose, 114 So. 3d 822 (Ala. Civ. App. 2012). · cites it 2× “01, we held that, “[b]ecause the mother did not present or establish any defense to the enforcement of the South Carolina judgment under § 30-3B-308(d), the only possible basis for the trial court’s failure to enforce that judgment would have had to have arisen from its…”
Ala. Code § 30-3B-308(b)(3): 1 case
Larose v. Larose, 71 So. 3d 651 (Ala. Civ. App. 2011). “The paternal grandparents also requested expedited enforcement of the custody determination under Ala.Code 1975, § 30-3B-308; in their enforcement petition, as required by § 30-3B-308(b)(3), the paternal grandparents apprised the court of the PFA restricting the paternal…”
Ala. Code § 30-3B-308(c): 1 case
Larose v. Larose, 71 So. 3d 651 (Ala. Civ. App. 2011). “The paternal grandparents also requested expedited enforcement of the custody determination under Ala.Code 1975, § 30-3B-308; in their enforcement petition, as required by § 30-3B-308(b)(3), the paternal grandparents apprised the court of the PFA restricting the paternal…”
Ala. Code § 30-3B-308(d): 2 cases
Larose v. Larose, 71 So. 3d 651 (Ala. Civ. App. 2011). “The paternal grandparents also requested expedited enforcement of the custody determination under Ala.Code 1975, § 30-3B-308; in their enforcement petition, as required by § 30-3B-308(b)(3), the paternal grandparents apprised the court of the PFA restricting the paternal…”
LaRose v. LaRose, 114 So. 3d 822 (Ala. Civ. App. 2012). “01, we held that, “[b]ecause the mother did not present or establish any defense to the enforcement of the South Carolina judgment under § 30-3B-308(d), the only possible basis for the trial court’s failure to enforce that judgment would have had to have arisen from its…”
Ala. Code § 30-3B-308(d)(1): 1 case
Hammack v. Moxcey, 220 So. 3d 1053 (Ala. Civ. App. 2016). “See Ala.Code 1975, § 30-3B-308(d)(1)c. In this case, the mother presented only her affidavit as evidence to support her position.”
Ala. Code § 30-3B-308(d)(l): 1 case
Hammack v. Moxcey, 220 So. 3d 1053 (Ala. Civ. App. 2016). “See Ala.Code 1975, § 30-3B-308(d)(1)c. In this case, the mother presented only her affidavit as evidence to support her position.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.