Code of Alabama

Ala. Code § 31-13-17 (2026)

Discriminatory Employment Practices.

✓ official Alabama Legislature (ALISON) text, current July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaAla. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) It shall be a discriminatory practice for a business entity or employer to fail to hire a job applicant who is a United States citizen or an alien who is authorized to work in the United States as defined in 8 U.S.C. § 1324a(h)(3) or discharge an employee working in Alabama who is a United States citizen or an alien who is authorized to work in the United States as defined in 8 U.S.C. § 1324a(h)(3) while retaining or hiring an employee who the business entity or employer knows, or reasonably should have known, is an unauthorized alien.

(b) A violation of subsection (a) may be the basis of a civil action in the state courts of this state. Any recovery under this subsection shall be limited to compensatory relief and shall not include any civil or criminal sanctions against the employer.

(c) The losing party in any civil action shall pay the court costs and reasonable attorneys fees for the prevailing party; however, the losing party shall only pay the attorneys fees of the prevailing party up to the amount paid by the losing party for his or her own attorneys fees.

(d) The amount of the attorneys fees spent by each party shall be reported to the court before the verdict is rendered.

(e) In proceedings of the court, the determination of whether an employee is an unauthorized alien shall be made by the federal government, pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1373(c). The court shall consider only the federal government’s determination when deciding whether an employee is an unauthorized alien. The court may take judicial notice of any verification of an individual’s immigration status previously provided by the federal government and may request the federal government to provide further automated or testimonial verification.

(Act 2011-535, p. 888, §17.)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2012–2012 · leading case: United States v. State of Alabama, 691 F.3d 1269 (11th Cir. 2012).
United States v. State of Alabama, 691 F.3d 1269 (11th Cir. 2012). “Ala.Code § 31-13-17(a). It provides a civil cause of action for recovery of compensatory damages related to this “discriminatory practice” as well as court costs and attorneys’ fees for the prevailing party.”
— Ala. Code § 31-13-17(a) — 1 case
United States v. State of Alabama, 691 F.3d 1269 (11th Cir. 2012). “Ala.Code § 31-13-17(a). It provides a civil cause of action for recovery of compensatory damages related to this “discriminatory practice” as well as court costs and attorneys’ fees for the prevailing party.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.