Ala. Code
Code of Alabama

Ala. Code § 36-18-20 (2026)

Declaration of Purpose.

✓ official Alabama Legislature (ALISON) text, laws through the 2026 Regular Session
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaAla. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The Legislature hereby finds, determines and declares:

(a) That the tragic incidence of violent crime in our society is growing at an alarming rate, and that these offenses often times are committed by repeat or habitual offenders against our most innocent and defenseless citizens.

(b) That there is a critical and urgent need to provide law enforcement officers and agencies with the latest scientific technology available for the purpose of identifying, apprehending, arresting, and convicting those violent offenders.

(c) That DNA testing, profiling, and analysis allows a more certain and rapid identification of such offenders as well as the exoneration of those wrongfully suspected or accused.

(d) That genetic identification technology through DNA testing is generally accepted by the relevant scientific community.

(e) That the procedures and techniques employing the underlying theory of DNA identification is capable of producing reliable results and are generally accepted in the relevant scientific community.

(f) That genetic identification established through DNA testing and analysis should be admissible as a matter of evidence in all courts of this state and that juries, both civil and criminal, should be responsible for assessing the weight, if any, to be given to expert testimony or evidence.

(g) That the creation and establishment of a statewide DNA database is the most reasonable and certain method or means to rapidly identify repeat or habitually dangerous criminals.

(h) That the Alabama Department of Forensic Sciences should be authorized and empowered to analyze, type and record any and all genetic markers contained in or derived from DNA and to create a statewide DNA database system for collection, storage and maintenance of genetic identification information as the same may pertain to the identification of criminal suspects.

(i) That because of the nature of genetic identification certain occasions may arise when genetic information may serve an array of humanitarian purposes, including, but not limited to, the identification of human remains from natural or mass disasters or the identification of missing, deceased or unidentified persons.

(j) That through the development of a population statistical database which does not include therein individual personal identification information an important research mechanism is obtained for the causation, detection and prevention of disease.

(k) That genetic identification is a rapidly expanding technology and the Director of the Alabama Department of Forensic Sciences should be authorized and empowered to adopt reasonable rules and regulations to support identification research and the development of standard protocols for forensic DNA analysis or tests and DNA quality control.

(l) That such needs are and ought to be intimately affected with the public interest.

The provisions of this article are to be liberally construed so as to accomplish these purposes and to promote the same which are hereby declared to be the public policy of this state.

(Acts 1994, 1st Ex. Sess., No. 94-804, p. 109, §1.)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1998–2017 · leading case: Turner v. State, 746 So. 2d 355 (Ala. 1998).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Turner v. State, 746 So. 2d 355 (Ala. 1998). · cites it 4× “We granted certiorari review to determine whether §§ 36-18-20 to -30, Ala.Code 1975, which were added to the Code in 1994, supersede the Perry standard.”
Maples v. State, 758 So. 2d 1 (Ala. Crim. App. 1999). “" Furthermore, the Alabama Legislature addressed law enforcement agencies' need for scientific testing in § 36-18-20, Ala. Code 1975, which provides as follows: "(a) That the tragic incidence of violent crime in our society is growing at an alarming rate, and that these offenses…”
Hammonds v. Comm'r, 712 F. App'x 841 (11th Cir. 2017). “See Ala. Code § 36-18-20 , et seq. Two to three months later, the final test results indicated a match between Hammonds’s DNA and the DNA extracted from the blood and semen samples obtained from the crime scene.”
D.B. v. State, 861 So. 2d 4 (Ala. Crim. App. 2003). · cites it 3× “Specifically, Hammonds contends that the blood sample, which was drawn by Holman Prison personnel pursuant to the CODIS requirements [Alabama combined DNA indexing system program, § 36-18-20 et seq.] and not pursuant to any warrant, was taken outside the administrative protocols…”
DB v. State, 861 So. 2d 4 (Ala. Crim. App. 2003). · cites it 4× “Specifically, Hammonds contends that the blood sample, which was drawn by Holman Prison personnel pursuant to the CODIS requirements [Alabama combined DNA indexing system program, § 36-18-20 et seq.] and not pursuant to any warrant, was taken outside the administrative protocols…”
Hammonds v. Allen, 849 F. Supp. 2d 1262 (M.D. Ala. 2012). “Because Hammonds was a convicted felon incarcerated in an Alabama penitentiary, a sample of his blood was drawn, pursuant to the Alabama combined DNA indexing system (“CODIS”) program (see § 36-18-20, Ala.Code 1975, et seq.), and the sample was sent to the Alabama Department of…”
Ala. Code § 36-18-20(d): 1 case
Turner v. State, 746 So. 2d 355 (Ala. 1998). “We granted certiorari review to determine whether §§ 36-18-20 to -30, Ala.Code 1975, which were added to the Code in 1994, supersede the Perry standard.”
Ala. Code § 36-18-20(h): 2 cases
D.B. v. State, 861 So. 2d 4 (Ala. Crim. App. 2003). “Specifically, Hammonds contends that the blood sample, which was drawn by Holman Prison personnel pursuant to the CODIS requirements [Alabama combined DNA indexing system program, § 36-18-20 et seq.] and not pursuant to any warrant, was taken outside the administrative protocols…”
DB v. State, 861 So. 2d 4 (Ala. Crim. App. 2003). “Specifically, Hammonds contends that the blood sample, which was drawn by Holman Prison personnel pursuant to the CODIS requirements [Alabama combined DNA indexing system program, § 36-18-20 et seq.] and not pursuant to any warrant, was taken outside the administrative protocols…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.