A supervisor shall not discharge, demote, transfer, or otherwise discriminate against a state employee regarding the state employee’s compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment if the state employee, reports, under oath or in the form of an affidavit, a violation of a law, a regulation, or a rule, promulgated pursuant to the laws of this state, or a political subdivision of this state, to a public body.
(Acts 1994, No. 94-244, p. 341, §3.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
4
cases, 1996–2014 · leading case:
Lane v. Franks, 573 U.S. 228 (2014).
Lane v. Franks, 573 U.S. 228 (2014).
“Lane also brought claims against CACC, as well as claims under a state whistleblower statute, Ala.Code § 36-26A-3 (2013), and 42 U.S.C.”
Dr. William P. Harman v. Univ. of Tennessee, 353 S.W.3d 734 (Tenn. 2011).
“Whistleblower statutes in the following jurisdictions specifically include "demotion” among prohibited employer actions: Alabama (Ala.Code § 36-26A-3 (2001)); Colorado (Colo.”
Edward R. Lane v. Cent. Alabama Cmty. Coll., 523 F. App'x 709 (11th Cir. 2013).
“On appeal, Lane has abandoned expressly (1) his claims against CACC; (2) his claims *711 for violation of the Alabama State Employee Protection Act, Ala.Code § 36-26A-3; (3) his claims for violation of 42 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.