Alaska Statutes

Alaska Stat. § 09.17.900 (2026)

Definition

✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AK-LEGakleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 09.17.900. Definition.
In this chapter, “fault” includes acts or omissions that are in any measure negligent, reckless, or intentional toward the person or property of the actor or others, or that subject a person to strict tort liability. The term also includes breach of warranty, unreasonable assumption of risk not constituting an enforceable express consent, misuse of a product for which the defendant otherwise would be liable, and unreasonable failure to avoid an injury or to mitigate damages. Legal requirements of causal relation apply both to fault as the basis for liability and to contributory fault.


Chapter 19. Prisoner and Correctional Facility Litigation Against the State.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1990–2013 · leading case: Todd A. Mulhern v. Catholic Health Initiatives, 799 N.W.2d 104 (Iowa 2011).
Todd A. Mulhern v. Catholic Health Initiatives, 799 N.W.2d 104 (Iowa 2011). · cites it 2× “” See Alaska Stat. Ann. § 09.17.900 (2010) (emphasis added); Idaho Code Ann.”
Couch v. Red Roof Inns, Inc., 729 S.E.2d 378 (Ga. 2012). “” ( Alaska Stat. § 09.17.900 (2012)); “ ‘fault’ includes an act, an omission, conduct, including intentional conduct, breach of warranty, or breach of a legal duty, or any conduct that could give.”
Coleman v. Soccer Ass'n, 69 A.3d 1149 (Md. 2013). “, Alaska Stat. § 09.17.900 (2012) (including intentional conduct in the definition of fault); Blazovic v.”
McKinnie v. Lundell Mfg. Co., 825 F. Supp. 834 (W.D. Tenn. 1993). “See Alaska Stat. § 09.17.900 (Supp.1992); Ark.”
Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc. v. United States, 755 F. Supp. 269 (D. Alaska 1990). “See Alaska Stat. § 09.17.900 (Supp.1990) which defines "fault” to include both negligence and strict liability.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.