Alaska Statutes
Alaska Stat. § 09.45.150 (2026)
Inquiry into merits of title
✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AK-LEGakleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 09.45.150. Inquiry into merits of title.
In an action to recover the possession on the land, tenement, or other real property where the entry is forcible or when the possession is unlawfully held by force, there shall be no inquiry into the merits of the title. Three years' quiet possession of the premises immediately preceding the commencement of the action by the party in possession or those under whom the party holds may be pleaded in bar thereof unless the estate of the party in the premises is ended.
In an action to recover the possession on the land, tenement, or other real property where the entry is forcible or when the possession is unlawfully held by force, there shall be no inquiry into the merits of the title. Three years' quiet possession of the premises immediately preceding the commencement of the action by the party in possession or those under whom the party holds may be pleaded in bar thereof unless the estate of the party in the premises is ended.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2023–2023 · leading case: Duckworth v. Duckworth, 534 P.3d 1076 (Or. Ct. App. 2023).
Duckworth v. Duckworth, 534 P.3d 1076 (Or. Ct. App. 2023). “”); Alaska Stat § 09.45.150 (“In an action to recover the possession on the land, tenement, or other real property where the entry is forcible or when the possession is unlawfully held by force, there shall be no inquiry into the merits of the title.”
Duckworth v. Duckworth, No. A176530 (Or. Ct. App. July 26, 2023). “”); Alaska Stat § 09.45.150 (“In an action to recover the possession on the land, tenement, or other real property where the entry is forcible or when the possession is unlawfully held by force, there shall be no inquiry into the merits of the title.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.