Alaska Statutes

Alaska Stat. § 11.20.350 (2026)

Receiving Stolen Goods. [Repealed, § 21 ch 166 SLA 1978. For current law, see

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AK-LEGakleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 11.20.350. Receiving Stolen Goods. [Repealed, § 21 ch 166 SLA 1978. For current law, see AS 11.46.190 and 11.46.210.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 36 cases, 1971–2006 · leading case: Andrew v. State, 653 P.2d 1063 (Alaska Ct. App. 1982).
Andrew v. State, 653 P.2d 1063 (Alaska Ct. App. 1982). · cites it 4× “Former AS 11.20.350 provided: Buyingreceiving, or concealing stolen property.”
Pistro v. State, 590 P.2d 884 (Alaska 1979). · cites it 2× “Mitchell Joseph Pistro appeals from his conviction of the offense of larceny and concealing stolen property in violation of AS 11.20.350(a). 1 He raises issues as to probable cause for his arrest, and the validity of a search of a garage and seizure of evidence.”
Eliason v. State, 511 P.2d 1066 (Alaska 1973). · cites it 6× “Eliason, Burns, and Gilbert were then arrested and subsequently indicted under AS 11.20.350 1 for the crime of concealing stolen property.”
Middleton v. State, 577 P.2d 1050 (Alaska 1978). · cites it 2× “Middleton, although only 22 years of age at the time of her arrest, had a prior conviction based on AS 11.20.350, receiving and concealing stolen goods, for which she received a sentence of 60 days.”
Hayes v. State, 581 P.2d 221 (Alaska 1978). · cites it 3× “Hayes was indicted on one count of concealing three stolen radios belonging to Alyeska Pipeline Service Company in violation of AS 11.20.350. He was convicted after a jury trial, sentenced to imprisonment for 18 months and fined $1,000.”
State v. DeVoe, 560 P.2d 12 (Alaska 1977). · cites it 2× “[2] AS 11.20.350 provides: Buying, receiving, or concealing stolen property.”
State v. Carlson, 560 P.2d 26 (Alaska 1977). “See AS 11.20.350. 6 . At the sentencing proceeding Judge Carlson remarked that he found the 20 year minimum sentence to be an inappropriate punishment for Davenport.”
Davenport v. State, 568 P.2d 939 (Alaska 1977). · cites it 2× “Tyrone Davenport was convicted by a jury of receiving or concealing stolen property in violation of AS 11.20.350 and was sentenced to eighteen months imprisonment to run concurrently with his other sentences imposed for prior convictions.”
Hensel v. State, 604 P.2d 222 (Alaska 1979). “At the time Hensel took possession of the explosives, AS 11.20.350 specified: A person who buys, receives, or conceals money, goods, bank notes, or other thing[s] which may be the subject of larceny and which has been taken, embezzled, or stolen from another person, knowing it…”
State v. Dague, 143 P.3d 988 (Alaska Ct. App. 2006). “29 The statute at issue, former AS 11.20.350, declared that this offense was a felony punishable by imprisonment “for not less than one year nor more than three years” if the stolen property exceeded $250 in value, but the maximum punishment was only one year’s imprisonment if…”
McCurry v. State, 538 P.2d 100 (Alaska 1975). · cites it 2× “After trial by jury, appellant Cornelius Otis MeCurry was found guilty of the crime of receiving and concealing stolen property in violation of AS 11.20.350. 1 MeCurry advances four separate specifications of error.”
Hubert v. State, 638 P.2d 677 (Alaska Ct. App. 1981). “Paul Hubert was convicted in a non-jury trial of receiving and concealing stolen property valued in excess of $250, in violation of former AS 11.20.350(a). Evidence introduced against Hubert included a number of items of stolen property seized in the course of a search of…”
— Alaska Stat. § 11.20.350(a) — 5 cases
Pistro v. State, 590 P.2d 884 (Alaska 1979). “Mitchell Joseph Pistro appeals from his conviction of the offense of larceny and concealing stolen property in violation of AS 11.20.350(a). 1 He raises issues as to probable cause for his arrest, and the validity of a search of a garage and seizure of evidence.”
Hayes v. State, 581 P.2d 221 (Alaska 1978). “Hayes was indicted on one count of concealing three stolen radios belonging to Alyeska Pipeline Service Company in violation of AS 11.20.350. He was convicted after a jury trial, sentenced to imprisonment for 18 months and fined $1,000.”
Hubert v. State, 638 P.2d 677 (Alaska Ct. App. 1981). “Paul Hubert was convicted in a non-jury trial of receiving and concealing stolen property valued in excess of $250, in violation of former AS 11.20.350(a). Evidence introduced against Hubert included a number of items of stolen property seized in the course of a search of…”
Saganna v. State, 594 P.2d 69 (Alaska 1979).
Edinger v. State, 598 P.2d 943 (Alaska 1979).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.