Alaska Statutes

Alaska Stat. § 11.46.150 (2026)

Theft in the fourth degree

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AK-LEGakleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 11.46.150. Theft in the fourth degree.
 (a) A person commits the crime of theft in the fourth degree if the person commits theft as defined in AS 11.46.100 and the value of the property or services is less than $250.

 (b) Theft in the fourth degree is a class B misdemeanor.




Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16 cases (5 in the last 5 years), 1985–2025 · leading case: Martin v. State, 797 P.2d 1209 (Alaska Ct. App. 1990).
Martin v. State, 797 P.2d 1209 (Alaska Ct. App. 1990). · cites it 2× “Martin was convicted of two counts of theft in the fourth degree, a class B misdemeanor, AS 11.46.150(a); three counts of theft in the second degree, a class C felony, AS 11.”
Anderson v. State, 123 P.3d 1110 (Alaska Ct. App. 2005). “See AS 11.46.150 (fourth-degree theft) and AS 11.”
Arabie v. State, 699 P.2d 890 (Alaska Ct. App. 1985). “Fourth-degree theft, a class B misdemeanor (AS 11.46.150), would become second-degree burglary, a class C felony (AS 11.”
Thomas v. State, 710 P.2d 1017 (Alaska Ct. App. 1985). “140(a)(1), and one count of theft in the fourth degree, AS 11.46.150(a). Judge Roy Madsen sentenced Thomas to sentences totaling eight years with four suspended on the four counts of second-degree theft.”
Brandon Lee Baer v. State of Alaska, 499 P.3d 1037 (Alaska Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 2× “130(a)(7) (2016), AS 11.46.150(a), and AS 11.56.800(a)(1)(B)(i), respectively.”
Pushruk v. State, 780 P.2d 1044 (Alaska Ct. App. 1989). “310(a), and fourth-degree theft, a class B misdemean- or, in violation of AS 11.46.150. Pushruk appeals his burglary conviction.”
State v. Amend, 250 P.3d 541 (Alaska Ct. App. 2011). “There is no indication that Turnage delayed transporting Amend to avoid the Stephan recording re *546 quirement.”
Kankanton v. State, 342 P.3d 840 (Alaska Ct. App. 2015). “See former AS 11.46.150(a) (2011) (theft of property worth less than 50 dollars); see also former AS 28.”
Schlosser v. State, 372 P.3d 272 (Alaska Ct. App. 2016). “The superior court will have to re-sentence Schlosser, and the State may conceivably ask the superior court to enter judgement against Schlosser for fourth-degree assault.”
Terry Allen Turner v. State of Alaska, 552 P.3d 1077 (Alaska Ct. App. 2024). “510(a)(1) and AS 11.46.150(a), respectively. The jury also found Turner guilty of fourth-degree assault, AS 11.”
Cross v. State, 813 P.2d 691 (Alaska Ct. App. 1991). “-300(a)(1) and AS 11.46.150. He appeals to this court arguing that his convictions are invalid because the state obtained the conviction in violation of the double jeopardy clauses of the United States and Alaska Constitutions.”
Gottlieb v. State, 175 P.3d 664 (Alaska Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 2× “37 Conclusion We VACATE Gottlieb’s conviction on count 1. We REVERSE Gottlieb’s convictions on counts 2, 5, 6, and 9.”
— Alaska Stat. § 11.46.150(a) — 8 cases
Martin v. State, 797 P.2d 1209 (Alaska Ct. App. 1990). “Martin was convicted of two counts of theft in the fourth degree, a class B misdemeanor, AS 11.46.150(a); three counts of theft in the second degree, a class C felony, AS 11.”
Thomas v. State, 710 P.2d 1017 (Alaska Ct. App. 1985). “140(a)(1), and one count of theft in the fourth degree, AS 11.46.150(a). Judge Roy Madsen sentenced Thomas to sentences totaling eight years with four suspended on the four counts of second-degree theft.”
Brandon Lee Baer v. State of Alaska, 499 P.3d 1037 (Alaska Ct. App. 2021). “130(a)(7) (2016), AS 11.46.150(a), and AS 11.56.800(a)(1)(B)(i), respectively.”
Kankanton v. State, 342 P.3d 840 (Alaska Ct. App. 2015). “See former AS 11.46.150(a) (2011) (theft of property worth less than 50 dollars); see also former AS 28.”
Schlosser v. State, 372 P.3d 272 (Alaska Ct. App. 2016). “The superior court will have to re-sentence Schlosser, and the State may conceivably ask the superior court to enter judgement against Schlosser for fourth-degree assault.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.