Alaska Stat. » Chapter 11.46
Alaska Statutes

Alaska Stat. § 11.46.190 (2026)

Theft by receiving

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AK-LEGakleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 11.46.190. Theft by receiving.
 (a) A person commits theft by receiving if the person buys, receives, retains, conceals, or disposes of stolen property with reckless disregard that the property was stolen.

 (b) As used in this section, “receives” includes acquiring possession, control, or title, or lending on the security of the property.




Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1982–2021 · leading case: Andrew v. State, 653 P.2d 1063 (Alaska Ct. App. 1982).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Andrew v. State, 653 P.2d 1063 (Alaska Ct. App. 1982). · cites it 26× “Andrew appeals from a conviction of theft by receiving, 1 contending that the statute under which he was convicted, AS 11.46.190, is unconstitutional. This statute, part of the Alaska Revised Criminal Code, first took effect on January 1, 1980, and provides, in relevant part:…”
State v. Saathoff, 29 P.3d 236 (Alaska 2001). · cites it 17× “100, and AS 11.46.190. Alaska - Statute 11.46.1830(2)(2) defines "theft in the second degree" to include theft of a firearm, and declares that "theft" is defined by AS 11.”
Harris v. State, 678 P.2d 397 (Alaska Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 6× “THE INDICTMENT Harris challenges the indictment for failing to specify that he must have had an "intent to deprive the owner of property" in order to be guilty of receiving and concealing stolen property.”
Saathoff v. State, 991 P.2d 1280 (Alaska Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 7× “180; (4) the person commits theft by receiving under AS 11.46.190; (5) the person commits theft of services under AS 11.”
Ace v. State, 672 P.2d 159 (Alaska Ct. App. 1983). · cites it 4× “We reverse Ace’s convictions because the trial court did not give proper instructions on the theft with which Ace was charged, theft by receiving, AS 11.46.190. Our disposition makes it unnecessary for us to reach Ace’s sentence appeal argument.”
Lindsay v. State, 698 P.2d 659 (Alaska Ct. App. 1985). · cites it 2× “Lindsay appeals his conviction, arguing that certain evidence should have been suppressed, that proceedings against him should have been dismissed pursuant to Alaska Rule of Criminal Procedure 45 and that denial of his continuance motion constituted reversible error.”
Bratcher v. State, 681 P.2d 358 (Alaska Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 3× “130(a)(1); AS 11.46.190. Superior Court Judge Victor D.”
Williams v. State, 648 P.2d 603 (Alaska Ct. App. 1982). · cites it 2× “AS 11.46.190 provides: Theft By Receiving.”
Brown v. State, 684 P.2d 874 (Alaska Ct. App. 1984). “130(a)(1); AS 11.46.190(a). He appeals under reservation of right in conformity with Oveson v.”
State v. Bell, 421 P.3d 128 (Alaska Ct. App. 2018). “Bell is not entitled to credit for Period II. And with respect to Period I, the case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with the guidance provided here.”
Luepke v. State, 765 P.2d 988 (Alaska Ct. App. 1988). “130(a)(1); AS 11.46.190. The maximum penalty is five years’ imprisonment.”
Namen v. State, 665 P.2d 557 (Alaska Ct. App. 1983). “Our disposition makes it unnecessary to consider Namen’s challenge to the constitutionality of Alaska’s theft by receiving statute, AS 11.46.190. We likewise need not consider the possible theory that the seizure of the stolen jewelry found at Namen’s residence might be…”
Show all 16 citing cases →
— Alaska Stat. § 11.46.190(a) — 5 cases
State v. Saathoff, 29 P.3d 236 (Alaska 2001). “100, and AS 11.46.190. Alaska - Statute 11.46.1830(2)(2) defines "theft in the second degree" to include theft of a firearm, and declares that "theft" is defined by AS 11.”
Andrew v. State, 653 P.2d 1063 (Alaska Ct. App. 1982). “Andrew appeals from a conviction of theft by receiving, 1 contending that the statute under which he was convicted, AS 11.46.190, is unconstitutional. This statute, part of the Alaska Revised Criminal Code, first took effect on January 1, 1980, and provides, in relevant part:…”
Brown v. State, 684 P.2d 874 (Alaska Ct. App. 1984). “130(a)(1); AS 11.46.190(a). He appeals under reservation of right in conformity with Oveson v.”
Saathoff v. State, 991 P.2d 1280 (Alaska Ct. App. 1999). “180; (4) the person commits theft by receiving under AS 11.46.190; (5) the person commits theft of services under AS 11.”
Andrew v. State, 237 P.3d 1027 (Alaska Ct. App. 2010).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.